Moving On | Choose your lifeMoving On | Choose your life
Safe Passage Foundation - Support to youth raised in high demand organizations


Saturday, January 31, 2009    

Home | New Content | Statistics | Games | FAQs

Getting Through : Lighten Up

Reader's comments on this article

Add a new comment on this article

from sarafina
Wednesday, October 29, 2003 - 17:26

(Agree/Disagree?)

When does 80 equal more than a 100?
(reply to this comment)

from Nick
Wednesday, October 22, 2003 - 13:27

(Agree/Disagree?)

A hunter starts out at his base camp and decides to go south the 1st day.After 5 miles he stops for the night. Next morning he wakes up and goes 3 miles east where he finds and shoots a bear. He drags the bear 5 miles north and is at his base camp.

What color was the bear?
(reply to this comment)

From Meathead
Friday, October 01, 2004, 04:02

(Agree/Disagree?)
white(reply to this comment
From Gar
Thursday, October 23, 2003, 14:05

(Agree/Disagree?)

A religious man was on a humanitarian mission in the jungles of Brazil when he gets caught by cannibals. Because he trespassed into their territory they vowed to kill him. But since he was religious they decided not to eat him, but instead give him his choice on how he would die. They told him he had 2 choices:

1. Die by poison

2. Die by fire

The way he decided this was they would give him his last words; if his last words were;

1. true the would kill him by poison, if they were

2. false they kill him by fire.

He thought and thought and came up with an answer that stumped them. They had to let him go.

What were his last words? (reply to this comment

From nenhum
Friday, October 01, 2004, 07:43

(
Agree/Disagree?)
he had no last words yet because they decided to let him go (reply to this comment
From Hydra
Thursday, October 23, 2003, 17:41

(Agree/Disagree?)
Ok, this is just a stab in the dark, but I believe his lasts words were something to the effect of, "You will kill me by fire". If they killed him by fire, it would be true & therefore they should actually kill him by poison. BUT, if they were to kill him by poison, then the answer would be false & they should kill him by fire, which makes it true & on and on in a circular sort of way, meaning that whatever they decided to do, the guy would be in the clear unless they decide to poison and burn him at the same time, in which case it really doesn't matter because either way he's dead.(reply to this comment
From Gar
Thursday, October 23, 2003, 22:49

(Agree/Disagree?)
Right on(reply to this comment
From Eaglebleeds
Thursday, October 23, 2003, 00:40

(
Agree/Disagree?)
I can't find any clues in that one. I don't see how you can figure out what color the bear was unless you know what part of the world he's hunting in. But I agree that he's in Alaska cause he only traveled 5 miles. So I'll go with WHITE.(reply to this comment
From frmrjoyish
Wednesday, October 22, 2003, 19:35

(Agree/Disagree?)
OK, I give up!! Is this a trick question?? I've been trying for 10 min to figure the sucker out!:)(reply to this comment
From Hydra
Wednesday, October 22, 2003, 21:35

(Agree/Disagree?)
Wouldn't the bear be white? I'm guessing that in the arctic circle, close to the North pole, "North", "South" & "East" are deceptive terms when combined with distance.(reply to this comment
From frmrjoyish
Thursday, October 23, 2003, 10:00

(Agree/Disagree?)
If it was in the arctic, white would be a good guess, but it didn't say where the location was! I can't believe howmuch this one got under my skin!!! It's been bugging me for 2 days now!!!(reply to this comment
From jpmagero
Thursday, October 23, 2003, 00:11

(Agree/Disagree?)
imagine a triangle, base camp being the tip and the north pole, going south 5 miles, then east 3 miles across the base of the triangle, then back north 5 miles to the tip. white sounds right to me(reply to this comment
From Nick
Thursday, October 23, 2003, 10:27

Average visitor agreement is 1 out of 5(Agree/Disagree?)

Exactly! You got the point there with the triangle.

He started out exactly at the North poll. Thatís the only place in the world where you can go 5 miles south, 3 miles west and 5 miles north and end up in the exact same spot that you started up in. (reply to this comment

from Hydra
Wednesday, October 22, 2003 - 09:57

(Agree/Disagree?)

Which animal, if annihilated off the face of the earth, could reappear by the 1000's within a year? No insects, germs, bacteria, gene mutation, dna manipulation, blah blah, etc.

Answer to number 1: Grandfather, father, grandson. Answer to number 2: I think this one is a little old, but what the heck: Electric train = no steam. Answer to number 3: Grandfather clock. Answer to number 4: The math is done improperly, but haven't the time to write it through here step by step.
(reply to this comment)

From sarafina
Thursday, October 23, 2003, 18:31

(Agree/Disagree?)
A Tortoise? I would think it would have to be a egg barring reptile unless the eggs have been annihilated too. Cause I know that certain tortoise lay many eggs at a time and they have incubation periods up to a year(reply to this comment
From Hydra
Friday, October 24, 2003, 01:10

(Agree/Disagree?)

Not an animal that has hatched from an egg. Hint: It is a mammal.(reply to this comment

From sarafina
Friday, October 24, 2003, 01:40

(Agree/Disagree?)
OK a Person? Cause if I was to die and be annihilated as a "human" there would be a thousand more people by the end of the year.(reply to this comment
From Hydra
Friday, October 24, 2003, 10:30

(Agree/Disagree?)

It wouldn't be a person because although you were to die and be annihilated, if the entire human race was annihilated....end of story.

The answer is surprisingly simple. A mule. A mule is a hybrid animal and is both sterile, as well as the combined offspring of a horse and a donkey. Annihilate the mules, and within a year, you have thousands more. Logically, this applies to all other hybrids as well. (reply to this comment

From jpmagero
Thursday, October 30, 2003, 18:53

(Agree/Disagree?)

I don't think that's very logical. It's not a given that they will reproduce, something has to make it happen (human intervention). In that case, any type of reproduction that can be done artificially would cause the species to survive (or revive from) annihilation. I suppose then you could include any bird that has laid eggs that hatch after the mother dies, or reptiles that lay eggs etc.

My too sents(reply to this comment

From frmrjoyish
Thursday, October 23, 2003, 18:40

(Agree/Disagree?)
Oooh!!! good one Sara!! Smart thinkin' there chick!! :)(reply to this comment
From Eaglebleeds
Thursday, October 23, 2003, 00:43

(
Agree/Disagree?)
Is it a certain kind of fish? Or does the answer need to be more specific?(reply to this comment
From Hydra
Thursday, October 23, 2003, 10:32

(Agree/Disagree?)
It's not a fish. The animal has a name.(reply to this comment
From Eaglebleeds
Thursday, October 23, 2003, 00:42

(
Agree/Disagree?)
Is it a certain kind of fish? Or (reply to this comment

My Stuff


log in here
to post or update your articles

Community

2 user/s currently online

Web Site User Directory
5047 registered users

log out of chatroom

Happy Birthday to demerit   Benz   tammysoprano  

Weekly Poll

What should the weekly poll be changed to?

 The every so often poll.

 The semi-anual poll.

 Whenever the editor gets to it poll.

 The poll you never heard about because you have never looked at previous polls which really means the polls that never got posted.

 The out dated poll.

 The who really gives a crap poll.

View Poll Results

Poll Submitted by cheeks,
September 16, 2008

See Previous Polls

Online Stores


I think, therefore I left


Check out the Official
Moving On Merchandise
. Send in your product ideas


Free Poster: 100 Reasons Why It's Great to be a Systemite

copyright © 2001 - 2009 MovingOn.org

[terms of use] [privacy policy] [disclaimer] [The Family / Children of God] [contact: admin@movingon.org] [free speech on the Internet blue ribbon] [About the Trailer Park] [Who Links Here]