Moving On | Choose your lifeMoving On | Choose your life
Safe Passage Foundation - Support to youth raised in high demand organizations


Saturday, January 31, 2009    

Home | New Content | Statistics | Games | FAQs

Getting Support : Inside Out

TFI's Statement about Not Without My Sister

from Falcon - Saturday, April 26, 2008
accessed 1299 times

This is the statement Family spokespersons Gideon and Rachel Scott released about 'Not Without My Sister'.





In preparing this statement, we encounter the difficulty of having to publicly

disagree with some former members of our Fellowship, which we have avoided

doing, as we love them and respect their decision to depart from our

fellowship. We have no wish to alienate them or add to their grievances, and

we believe that these former members are entitled to their personal

perspectives, outlooks and beliefs.

However, we believe that we also are entitled to a response, particularly

where The Family International is unfairly maligned and slandered, or where

stories are exaggerated to the point that it is difficult to separate truth

from fiction.

Although many people who have departed from our fellowship testify that their

experiences as a member of The Family International were positive ones, there

are some former members who have had some negative experiences, as in any

organisation.

We are saddened that anyone may have had negative experiences while in The

Family International. Beginning more than two decades ago policies were

implemented to ensure that the rights of our members could not be infringed

upon by others. We have taken great pains, both formally and informally, to

apologise for any grievances they have. We believe that such efforts have

been helpful for all parties involved. Far from being a true story as the

reviewer states, it is a very subjective account viewed through the prism of

reinterpretation. Thus, we will not attempt to address the personal

experiences of former members presented in this book, but rather will address

the main issues.

The Care and Protection of our Children

First a categorical restatement of our policies both public and private

regarding our member’s rights, both adult and children Any form of abuse,

whether sexual, physical or otherwise is absolutely forbidden in our

fellowship. Any infraction of this rule will result in immediate expulsion

from our fellowship. We do not condone or permit any inappropriate behaviour

with our children, whom we consider a precious gift from God to be protected

and nurtured.

The Family International recognises that during a short period of our history

our policies in this regard were not clearly articulated, which resulted in

isolated incidences of inappropriate behaviour towards minors. This was

officially corrected in 1986, when it was made clear, and we accept that it

should have been made clear earlier, that sexual contact between an adult and

minor was totally unacceptable. The Family International’s success in

protecting our children and ensuring their well being has been documented by

court-appointed and independent investigations of almost 700 children living

in Family communities. After extensive physical, psychological and

educational testing, all of the children were found to be healthy with no

sign of abuse in a single case. This total absence of abuse speaks for the

efforts made to safeguard children in Family communities. We question

whether the same statistics could be produced for children in society at

large.

We believe that this book bears witness to the fact that people's experiences

are often re-interpreted upon exiting a religious group, particularly a high

commitment religious movement such as The Family International. We ask

people to come and see our communities for themselves as well as read the

numerous studies which have been conducted by authorities and health care

professionals and the court cases which we have won around the world. Court

cases which we may add only came about because of allegations like this which

have stirred up hysteria against our religious group and have always ended

with judges finding in our favour.

In Australia for example social services were forced to pay damages to the

children for abuse they suffered at the hands of social services themselves.

The facts speak for themselves and whilst we are sad if any former members

have experienced conditions or treatment which is different from our positive

experience of being in The Family International for 36 years, we feel we must

speak up so that the general public does not misjudge our wonderful, well

documented Christian work throughout Africa on the basis of this book and its

allegations.

Gideon and Rachel Scott

Telephone **27 11 3154863 (Johannesburg)

familyafrica@mweb.co.za

--

Family Care Association is a branch of the Family International

(www.thefamilyinternational.org) a fellowship of independent missionary

communities dedicated to improving the health, education, and welfare of

those in need, and spreading God's message of love.

Changing lives, one heart at a time.

Contact us at: Postnet Suite # 548 Private Bag X18 Lynnwood Ridge,004

Pretoria, SA

Tel:073-985-3469 Fax:(021)-993-5231

Reader's comments on this article

Add a new comment on this article

from clark
Tuesday, September 23, 2008 - 07:25

(Agree/Disagree?)
I still don't understand how "putting guidlines in place" in the mid 80's allows them to ignore crimes that went on prior to that. Were they not wrong before then?  
(reply to this comment)
from Randi
Tuesday, September 23, 2008 - 03:53

(Agree/Disagree?)
Erm what dorks!! Aren't they a couple hyppies that have like 20 kids living out in the wilderness somewhere illegally importing cars from Japan or something?THAT speaks for itself. I wonder if TF actually realizes that they are a laughing stock and that absolutely no one takes them seriously.....?%& No one cares what they have to say... well I guess the media can alway use the cash.
(reply to this comment)
From Randi
Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 04:07

(Agree/Disagree?)

On a serious note... This kind of response is so typical from abusers in general...Any educated psychologist should be able to spot that. They are never wrong... they can never accept responsibility and they have no concience... they dont feel bad about it... It's always the victims fault and they generally accuse the victim of being crazy and remembering the incident wrong and of egateration. Typical and also typical!!! 

TF needs to realize that they have no right to say anything other than "I am so sorry" and that is IT!...and they need to realize that they are only making themselves look worse by all this "justification" crap. Its like they suffer from a collective retardation syndrome... They're only making themselves look bad by writting this kind of doo doo. When are they gonna get that??????????????????????????????????????????????????(reply to this comment

From Big Sister
Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 21:15

(Agree/Disagree?)
Well, I don't know. I think in addition to "I am so sorry" an offer to make reparations is in order. Fits right in with their backwards "Words speak Louder than Actions" philosophy.(reply to this comment
from Robyn Pistols
Monday, September 22, 2008 - 12:31

(Agree/Disagree?)
What motivation would anyone have to 'make up' a story of abuse? And then to tell as many people as they can?

However, what motivation would an abuser have to deny knowledge and slander evidence of what was done?

I think anyone with a functioning brain can answer that for themselves.

Why should anyone trust a pedophile to tell the truth ha ha!
Thats the best they can do!
(reply to this comment)
from der Teufel
Friday, May 09, 2008 - 01:17

(Agree/Disagree?)
Haha, I can't believe I've even met those people several times and stayed under their roof for a while.
"Any form of abuse, whether sexual, physical or otherwise is absolutely forbidden in our fellowship. Any infraction of this rule will result in immediate expulsion from our fellowship." When was that statement "supposedly" put into action?
Because I know and have heard of people who have been abused recently enough (in the 90s, after TF made it "clear" that abusers were not tolerated), and when they finally reported it to WS (mind you, they reported it RECENTLY), WS took no steps against the abuser.
It would be interesting to know what percentage of the abusers in TFI were expelled (...); I'm sure we'd be pretty shocked to see how many perverts make up the whole of the cult.
It's hard to think that most civilized countries haven't done anything drastic (or relevantly drastic) to prevent the life and growth of cults. If they have, it is obviously *not effective.*
(reply to this comment)
from cosmogrrl
Monday, April 28, 2008 - 17:26

(Agree/Disagree?)

It's interesting that Gideon and Rachel accuse you of exaggeration, but they avoid getting into any details of what specifically is untrue or exaggerated. They did the same thing with Mene. Since they knew that they couldn't deny her claims were true, they resorted to attacking her character and sanity.

Also, the statement is written by people who were not with you and your sisters throughout your childhood and who have no way of knowing if anything you wrote is fictitious. For what it's worth, I read your book in one sitting. You ladies are very brave to put it all out there, and I'm sure your book will help many.
(reply to this comment)

from jez
Monday, April 28, 2008 - 13:31

(Agree/Disagree?)
OMFG! They've got a trademark sign next to their name! Like someone wants to steal THEIR identity. The mind boggles at their inflated sense of importance. Ahhh too good! LMAO!
(reply to this comment)
from Peter
Sunday, April 27, 2008 - 19:26

Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5(Agree/Disagree?)
Apparently, lying comes so naturally to Family spokespersons like Rachel and Gideon Scott that they just don't know how to respond to anything without making blatantly false and deceptive statements.

For example, they state that "This was officially corrected in 1986, when it was made clear, and we accept that it should have been made clear earlier, that sexual contact between an adult and minor was totally unacceptable."

That is indeed interesting because in a recent Family publication, child molester Steven Douglas Kelly (aka Peter Amsterdam) devoted more than 20 paragraphs to an attempt to explain why it would be unfair and unjust for The Family to expel members who RAPED CHILDREN before July 1989.[1] According to Kelly, one of the two top leaders of the The Family, before July 1989 it was so unclear to Family members that raping children was wrong that it would be extremely unfair for The Family to expel the child molesters who raped children before The Family's "moral turnaround" on the issue of raping children. If Kelly's statements in an official publication of The Family International are true, then the statement by Rachel and Gideon Scott must be false.

It's also interesting that they state that "The Family International's success in protecting our children and ensuring their well being has been documented by court-appointed and independent investigations of almost 700 children living in Family communities. After extensive physical, psychological and educational testing, all of the children were found to be healthy with no sign of abuse in a single case. This total absence of abuse speaks for the efforts made to safeguard children in Family communities. We question whether the same statistics could be produced for children in society at large."

Yes, if you completely ignore every single case of abuse that is found, it is quite easy to produce false and misleading statistics. The Family claims that "court-appointed and independent investigations" have never uncovered a "sign of abuse" in a "single case." This claim is absolutely false and they know it. It only takes a few moments to find many cases, involving children raised in The Family, where a "sign of abuse" was found. Here are four of those cases.

On June 4, 1993, long-time Family member Jean Michel Ardolade was arrested and jailed in Grasse, France on charges of sexually abusing his daughters, then aged 15, 13, and 11 years old, over a period of several years. On the same day, his wife was also arrested and jailed on charges of knowing about the abuse but failing to report the crimes against her children. In May 1997, he was sentenced by the Criminal Court of Alpes-Maritimes in France to 19 years in prison and his wife was sentenced to 3 years in prison.[2]

On November 14, 1994, longtime Family member Gerald P. Curran was charged in Henry County, Illinois with with one count of aggravated criminal sexual assault of a child under the age of 13 and one count of aggravated criminal sexual abuse of a child under the age of 13. On July 6, 1995, he pled guilty to one charge in exchange for the second sentence being dismissed and an 11-year prison sentence. [3]

On April 23, 1998, Judge James Milliken of the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, ordered a child sexually abused by long-time Family member Philip Sloan and others removed from the custody of two members of The Family, Tom and Donna Marchbank. An extensive investigation by court-appointed experts uncovered numerous instances of abuse from 1986 until 1997.[4]

In May 2001, the Criminal Court of Aix-en Provence (Bouches-du-Rhone) in France gave a long-time Family member a suspended sentence of 18 months in prison and terminated his parental rights for child sexual abuse and "contributing to the delinquency of a minor" by encouraging his 8-year-old son to engage in sexual play with the children of other Family members and then filming these interactions. The conviction and extraordinarily light sentence was the result of an investigation that began in 1991.[5]

References
1. "The Family’s History, Policies, and Beliefs Regarding Sex—Part 3", GN 1236 FD/MM/FM, ML 3673, 2007-10, 2007-12, paragraphs 60-80.
http://xfamily.org/index.php/The_Family%E2%80%99s_History%2C_Policies%2C_and_Beliefs_Regarding_Sex
2. http://xfamily.org/index.php/Jean_Michel_Ardolade
3. http://xfamily.org/index.php/Gerald_P._Curran
4. http://xfamily.org/index.php/Philip_Sloan
5. http://www.exfamily.org/art/misc/cult_justice.shtml





(reply to this comment)
From Peter
Sunday, April 27, 2008, 19:31

(Agree/Disagree?)
Oops. There is an error in the second sentence of the seventh paragraph of my comment. That sentence should read as follows:

"On July 6, 1995, he pled guilty to one charge in exchange for the second charge being dismissed and an 11-year prison sentence."(reply to this comment
from GetReal
Sunday, April 27, 2008 - 11:47

(Agree/Disagree?)
What a joke. It’s very possible that Gideon’s “interpretation” of his time in the family has been slightly influenced by the fact that he used fake family charities to enrich himself. Gid and Rachael live in a million dollar house that was paid for at least in part by a car importation scam. South Africa heavily taxes importation of foreign car except those brought in by charities. Using this loophole Gideon and other cult members have brought hundreds of cars to be sold and obviously pocketing the money for himself. As far as I can remember they did not engage in any charity, unless singing Jesus come into my heart at a couple schools a year qualifies as charity. Cult statements would carry more weight if they weren’t all made by unrepentant criminals.
(reply to this comment)
From Randi
Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 03:56

(Agree/Disagree?)
Yes and they have like a billion kids... Not very responsible if you ask me(reply to this comment
from Jailbird
Sunday, April 27, 2008 - 11:34

(Agree/Disagree?)

What nonsense.


(reply to this comment)

from Lance
Sunday, April 27, 2008 - 10:58

(Agree/Disagree?)

Oh joy! Another dillwad family spokesperson who can't distiguish between libel and slander.

If they are going to use the libel defense they should at least use the right word.
(reply to this comment)

from so sad
Sunday, April 27, 2008 - 09:39

(Agree/Disagree?)
"...we feel we must

speak up so that the general public does not misjudge our wonderful, well

documented Christian work throughout Africa on the basis of this book and its

allegations. "

there is the motive. losing money!




(reply to this comment)
from gosh!
Saturday, April 26, 2008 - 20:37

(Agree/Disagree?)

It doesn't matter that anything was ever "ARTICULATED." What matters is that criminal acts against children were committed and NEVER brought to justice.
(reply to this comment)

from Samuel
Saturday, April 26, 2008 - 20:18

(Agree/Disagree?)
Just curious, does anyone know what would happen if we called the phone numbers in the article? Who would answer, is it a Public Relations home or something?
(reply to this comment)
From cheeks
Saturday, April 26, 2008, 20:23

(Agree/Disagree?)
oooooooooooh lets all call collect.(reply to this comment
from cheeks
Saturday, April 26, 2008 - 20:14

Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5(Agree/Disagree?)
I read the book and I did not feel at any time that there were any gross inaccuracies in it. As a matter of fact I was one of the detention teens that was in the Jumbo. So I remember very clearly what went on there.

I was also molested in Portugal when I was thirteen years old by deaf Gabriel, if I remember correctly it was 92, when I reported the molestation to the shepherds I was blamed for not stopping him. My parents were also told that I was molested as they lived in another home 150 miles away and they never came to see if I was alright, and they never asked for me and my sisters one who was younger than me to be sent back to them. The Family has a pattern for protecting the abusers and maligning the victims.

To the Family. We are your children, there is little you have not done to us in the name of God. You have beaten and starved us, you have locked us up, you have sexually molested us, you have prayed over us to exercise the demons we did not have inside us. You have bound us, isolated us, humiliated us, and denied us the basic rights we have as humans. You still cannot see that what you did was wrong. You still cannot seek forgiveness, instead you deny what happened. You justify your actions by your absurd belief that what you did was done in our best interest and in the name of your God. You reject reality and substitute your own. Face what you have done and the shame that comes with it because we will never stop. We will never tire and we will not fail. We have the truth on our side and all you have is delusion.
(reply to this comment)
From cheeks
Saturday, April 26, 2008, 20:17

Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5(Agree/Disagree?)
I wanted to add that I am so sorry Falcon that this was the best response the Family could give to you and your sisters brave women who have been to hell and came back to tell their story.(reply to this comment
From Falcon
Sunday, April 27, 2008, 05:37

(Agree/Disagree?)
Not to worry, Cheeks. As I never carried any expectation of an adequate response, there is no disappointment, just a good dose of ambivalence if that's the best they can come up with. (reply to this comment
from Big Sister
Saturday, April 26, 2008 - 18:00

(Agree/Disagree?)
What! Now TF is dedicated to improving people's EDUCATION?
First time I've seen that claim. How about they just take care of educating my nieces and nephews and never-mind claiming they can educate other people.
(reply to this comment)
from What hogwash!
Saturday, April 26, 2008 - 16:49

(Agree/Disagree?)
"during a short period of our history our policies in this regard were not clearly articulated"

Oh, no. During a long period of your history, your policies in this regard were VERY CLEARLY articulated.
(reply to this comment)
From afflick
Sunday, April 27, 2008, 08:25

Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5(Agree/Disagree?)

'Not Without My Sister' was a memoire. A collection of personal experiences by three sisters. It is so weird that the Scotts try to attack personal experiences. Yes, Family homes can be visited (if they can be found) and whoever visits one can take away an experience. But that visit does not detract from the life experiences of the authors. Nor does it take away my own.

This is what I think The Family doesn't get about this new wave of 'detractors.' We are not academics or deprogrammers or parents of cult members. We are nothing that they have ever experienced before. We are their children. When we say "I was molested", "I was abused systematically growing up in The Family" it doesn't matter that The Family can trot out fifty kids who say, "I was not abused." It doesn't take way my experience. I still had MY experience. While in the past, The Family could point to outsider critics and say that they did not have true perspective of what The Family was all about, they can't say that about us. We lived with them, we experienced it all.

Pure conjecture: Gideon and Rachel Scott have, what? 12 or 13 children. Their oldest is about my age or a bit older. Their youngest is probably a pre-teen. I would bet that their older children had quite a different childhood than the younger children. Especially since the older ones were in India in the '80s (a hotspot of child abuse). If they all got together and the younger ones said, "I was not abused" and the olders ones were, who's right? The answer is both. One child's experience cannot negate another's.

And that is what's so strange about The Family's reaction. They are still using the old tools, the ones that worked before their worst detractors were their children. When their critics were outsiders, it worked to say, "But that is not our experience." Because those who had not lived it could only speculate at the abuse. But here's the thing. Now there are critics who HAVE lived The Family experience and it no longer works to say we don't have a good handle on what it means to be raised in The Family. We do. And The Family cannot come up with a good argument against our life experiences. (reply to this comment

My Stuff


log in here
to post or update your articles

Community

81 user/s currently online

Web Site User Directory
5047 registered users

log out of chatroom

Happy Birthday to demerit   Benz   tammysoprano  

Weekly Poll

What should the weekly poll be changed to?

 The every so often poll.

 The semi-anual poll.

 Whenever the editor gets to it poll.

 The poll you never heard about because you have never looked at previous polls which really means the polls that never got posted.

 The out dated poll.

 The who really gives a crap poll.

View Poll Results

Poll Submitted by cheeks,
September 16, 2008

See Previous Polls

Online Stores


I think, therefore I left


Check out the Official
Moving On Merchandise
. Send in your product ideas


Free Poster: 100 Reasons Why It's Great to be a Systemite

copyright © 2001 - 2009 MovingOn.org

[terms of use] [privacy policy] [disclaimer] [The Family / Children of God] [contact: admin@movingon.org] [free speech on the Internet blue ribbon] [About the Trailer Park] [Who Links Here]