Reader's comments on this article Add a new comment on this article

from exister Monday, January 30, 2006 - 10:24 (Agree/Disagree?) Sod off, you silly script kiddy. (reply to this comment)

from Temporary Sunday, January 29, 2006 - 16:53 (Agree/Disagree?) It's strange and rather intriguing of human nature when someone gets angry/wrongly rubbed, that the feel that they need to use extreme amounts of colorful language. Don't get me wrong, I quite enjoy using verbal attacks...just it's usually when a guy is trying to get into a fight with me, but just doesn't wanna make the first move. It was not, however, my idea to post this under "this site sucks". Cuz Hey, I quite like this site, amusing it is. And great designing too. And no, to whoever it was who said (Damn, I love this saying:) "cult propaganda". Abi AKA Sharon who currently resides in Africa (Cote' de Ivoire - Ivory Coast was it?) told me. Contrary to what many of you may believe, this wasn't a "flame" post. I got a great kick out of it. So good night all and have morbid dreams...I know I will. (Or good dreams if that suits you better, ya dig?) (reply to this comment)

From JohnnieWalker Sunday, January 29, 2006, 22:34 (Agree/Disagree?) You said, "this wasn't a 'flame' post." Then what was it? I'm sure you're smart enough to know you wouldn't have gotten a positive reaction to this. So that leaves us to conclude you wrote this to get a rise out of people. Isn't that called 'flaming?' PS: This was posted under the "This Site Sucks" section because it wasn't a "Lighten Up" kind of article.(reply to this comment)

From Temporary Sunday, January 29, 2006, 23:49 (Agree/Disagree?) If you are in any way offendend...oops. But it was just a post for the hell of posting. I don't see what everyone is getting all hyper about...(reply to this comment)

From JohnnieWalker Monday, January 30, 2006, 23:14 (Agree/Disagree?) I guess I see where you're coming from. I was young and foolish once, too. No worries. You'll grow out of it. :P(reply to this comment)

From Fish Sunday, January 29, 2006, 16:59 (Agree/Disagree?) No, I do not "dig".(reply to this comment)

From Temporary Sunday, January 29, 2006, 17:44 (Agree/Disagree?) OOOO, I'm scared now. :p(reply to this comment)

from Joey Wednesday, January 25, 2006 - 06:42 (Agree/Disagree?) It's odd that someone with so healthy an ego (as it would appear) could exist in a group such as the TF. I guess when propped up by falsities then falsities flourish. heh!!! man I hope your false sense of self finds it's founding one day and that you look back on this and know that if indeed anyone was planning some form of exit for you that you will see where it's motivation originated and be gratefull for it's presence replacing your current scorn. Unfortunately for you right now so many people can see the things you are blinded to. Please look inside and search for your own peace rather than adopting the peace of another and in turn adopting their sick sense of meaning. Can you tell me the theories on life and all it's diverse richness that you have concocted yourself without contamination from outside sources? Joey (reply to this comment)

From Temporary Friday, February 10, 2006, 20:17 (Agree/Disagree?) Last I checked, having an ego isn't against the charter. And your post has absolutely nothing to do with the topic. I have always had my own peace, cuz hey, there is no-one else who I could adopt peace from. And my theories on life are confidential.(reply to this comment)

From Uncle MegaGroan Friday, February 10, 2006, 21:32 (Agree/Disagree?) Temporary, you know you're only a vessel for God to use. Remember: "The less there is of you, the more the light shines through!" I'm going to assign you to read "Mama's prayer for Magdalene" and then write a reaction to it. OK? Also I'm getting a strong check in the spirit that you need to read: "I am a Toilet", I'm not sure why, it just seems especially applicable to you. Come on everyone, sing along now: "You know I need you Lord, you know I need you Lord" "Please don't let me be, self-satisfied, Self-sanctified, self-glorified" (Repeat) "I'd rather be fried, on a ten foot pole, that's how many of our brothers died, that's how they testified."(reply to this comment)

from someone who knows you Wednesday, January 25, 2006 - 03:01 (Agree/Disagree?) Richard, why on earth did you post this article? You *were* wrong to hack into Jules' private email, and she had a perfect right to be pissed off. I still can't understand why you posted this article. Do you think that any of us really care what someone who we don't know and have never met has told you about some outlandish plan to extradite you? Are you still buying into the cult's propaganda that all of us who interact on this site are one big conspiracy? Please explain your purpose for posting this article. Thanks. (reply to this comment)

From Temporary Sunday, January 29, 2006, 16:58 (Agree/Disagree?) Who are you? And I doubt you know me.(reply to this comment)

From well, okay... Monday, January 30, 2006, 05:24 (Agree/Disagree?) I guess I can't say that I *know* you, seeing as the last time I saw you, you were probably younger than ten years old. But I *knew* you when you were a kid, and in fact I was your teacher for quite a while, off and on. I just couldn't see any point to the article, that's all. Now that it transpires that you had intended for it to be posted in the Lighten Up section, I can kinda see it from you perspective, I suppose.(reply to this comment)

From Temporary Monday, January 30, 2006, 18:08 (Agree/Disagree?) So...who are you exactly? Do you have a name?(reply to this comment)

from Baxter Wednesday, January 25, 2006 - 01:41 (Agree/Disagree?) Who is this creep and why would anyone want to extradite him? Please tell me admin, I wanna know. I'm sure hacking into someone's computor 'for fun' constitutes a crime, does it not? Judging from the context of this article, it sounds as though that was not the reason why someone would want this extradited. (reply to this comment)

from Baxter Wednesday, January 25, 2006 - 01:41 (Agree/Disagree?) Who is this creep and why would anyone want to extradite him? Please tell me admin, I wanna know. I'm sure hacking into someone's computor 'for fun' constitutes a crime, does it not? Judging from the context of this article, it sounds as though that was not the reason why someone would want this extradited. (reply to this comment)

from MegaGroan Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - 22:54 (Agree/Disagree?) Well I'm glad Denmark managed to work out an extradition treaty with Denmark. I am curious though, is it a crime to deliberately hack into someone else's e-mail account with malicious intent? I doubt law enforcement would want to waste time with this twerp, but just out of curiosity, did he commit a crime? (reply to this comment)

From Temporary Sunday, January 29, 2006, 16:56 (Agree/Disagree?) sorry, typo, "Extradition treaty with the u.s.a." Happy now?(reply to this comment)