Pituitary-Adrenal,Autonomic Responses to Stress in Women After Sexual/Physical Abuse in Childhood.

from moon beam - Wednesday, July 20, 2005
accessed 1884 times

Introduction: The following article was initially broadcast on the National Public Radio. The radio segment nicely reviewed the material contained in the article. The data derived from careful clinical testing supports the thesis that the developing brain of children are affected by the stresses that those of us who attended boarding school were subjected to. The changes in the brain make us more susceptible to depression and stress related disorders later in life. While the clinical data can be difficult for the untrained to understand, it is important because it proves that the changes that were examined are real, and not just a random phenomena that can be explained away by "chance." It's can be difficult to accept the reality that the "programming" we were subjected to can greatly increase the changes of becoming depressed later in life, but it's also can be reaffirming to realize why many of us have had these types of stress related disorders,including men.

Christine Heim, PhD; D. Jeffrey Newport, MD; Stacey Heit, MD; Yolanda P. Graham, MD; Molly Wilcox, BA; Robert Bonsall, PhD; Andrew H. Miller, MD; Charles B. Nemeroff, MD, PhD

Context Evidence suggests that early adverse experiences play a preeminent role in development of mood and anxiety disorders and that corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) systems may mediate this association.

Objective To determine whether early-life stress results in a persistent sensitization of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis to mild stress in adulthood, thereby contributing to vulnerability to psychopathological conditions.

Design and Setting Prospective controlled study conducted from May 1997 to July 1999 at the General Clinical Research Center of Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga.

Participants Forty-nine healthy women aged 18 to 45 years with regular menses, with no history of mania or psychosis, with no active substance abuse or eating disorder within 6 months, and who were free of hormonal and psychotropic medications were recruited into 4 study groups (n = 12 with no history of childhood abuse or psychiatric disorder [controls]; n = 13 with diagnosis of current major depression who were sexually or physically abused as children; n = 14 without current major depression who were sexually or physically abused as children; and n = 10 with diagnosis of current major depression and no history of childhood abuse).

Main Outcome Measures Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol levels and heart rate responses to a standardized psychosocial laboratory stressor compared among the 4 study groups.

Results Women with a history of childhood abuse exhibited increased pituitary-adrenal and autonomic responses to stress compared with controls. This effect was particularly robust in women with current symptoms of depression and anxiety. Women with a history of childhood abuse and a current major depression diagnosis exhibited a more than 6-fold greater ACTH response to stress than age-matched controls (net peak of 9.0 pmol/L [41.0 pg/mL]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7-13.3 pmol/L [21.6-60.4 pg/mL]; vs net peak of 1.4 pmol/L [6.19 pg/mL]; 95% CI, 0.2-2.5 pmol/L [1.0-11.4 pg/mL]; difference, 8.6 pmol/L [38.9 pg/mL]; 95% CI, 4.6-12.6 pmol/L [20.8-57.1 pg/mL]; P<.001).

Conclusions Our findings suggest that hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and autonomic nervous system hyperreactivity, presumably due to CRF hypersecretion, is a persistent consequence of childhood abuse that may contribute to the diathesis for adulthood psychopathological conditions. Furthermore, these results imply a role for CRF receptor antagonists in the prevention and treatment of psychopathological conditions related to early-life stress.

JAMA. 2000;284:592-597
JOC92111

The relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors in the etiology of psychiatric disorders has long been a hotly debated area of investigation. Considerable evidence from a variety of studies suggests a preeminent role of early adverse experiences in the development of mood and anxiety disorders. One study1 composed of almost 2000 women revealed that those with a history of childhood sexual or physical abuse exhibited more symptoms of depression and anxiety and had more frequently attempted suicide than women without a history of childhood abuse. Women who have been abused in childhood are 4 times more likely to develop syndromal major depression in adulthood than women who have not been abused, and the magnitude of the abuse is correlated with the severity of depression.2

Early parental loss predominantly due to parental separation has also been found to increase the risk for major depression in case-control and epidemiological studies.3-8 Twin studies9, 10 have provided concordant findings. Childhood abuse also predisposes to the development of anxiety disorders in adulthood, including panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder.11, 12 In addition, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) may be a direct consequence of childhood abuse, and, moreover, such trauma early in life also appears to increase an individual's risk of developing PTSD in response to other traumas in adulthood.13 Depression and anxiety disorders, including PTSD, are often comorbid in individuals with a history of diverse early adversities.14

There is evidence that central nervous system (CNS) corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) systems are likely to mediate the association between early-life stress and the development of mood and anxiety disorders in adulthood. Corticotropin-releasing factor neurons are found not only in the hypothalamus, but also in the neocortex and the central nucleus of the amygdala, which are believed to be involved in cognitive and emotional processing and in brainstem nuclei that contain the bulk of the noradrenergic and serotonergic perikarya that project to the forebrain.

These CNS CRF systems have also been strongly implicated in the pathophysiology of both depression and anxiety disorders.15 Thus, when administered directly into the CNS of laboratory animals, CRF produces many physiological and behavioral changes that closely parallel symptoms of depression and anxiety, such as elevations of peripheral adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), corticosterone, and catecholamine concentrations, increases in heart rate and mean arterial pressure, changes in gastrointestinal activity, decreased reproductive behavior, decreased appetite, disruption of sleep, increased grooming behavior, increased locomotor activity in a familiar environment, suppression of exploratory behavior in a novel environment, potentiation of acoustic startle responses, facilitation of fear conditioning, and enhancement of shock-induced freezing and fighting behavior.16-20

Enhanced release of CRF from 1 or more CNS circuits may, thus, account for many of the symptoms of depression and anxiety and for the frequent comorbidity between these disorders.21, 22 Indeed, our group and others have repeatedly measured increased CRF-like immunoreactivity in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of untreated depressed patients compared with healthy controls and patients with other psychiatric disorders.23-26 Moreover, increased numbers of CRF-positive neurons and increased CRF messenger RNA (mRNA) expression have recently been measured in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) in postmortem hypothalamic tissue of untreated depressed patients.27, 28 Similar to findings in depression, increased CSF CRF concentrations have been reported in patients with PTSD and obsessive-compulsive disorder.29-31

Of particular relevance to the current study is evidence from preclinical studies that suggests that increased activity of CRF circuits may be the persisting neurobiological consequence of stress early in development. Adult rats repeatedly separated from their dams for 180 min/d on postnatal days 2 to 14 demonstrate increased CRF concentrations in the median eminence, hypothalamohypophysial portal blood, and CSF and increased CRF mRNA expression in the hypothalamic PVN under resting conditions. In response to a variety of stressors, these maternally separated rats exhibit increased CRF mRNA expression in the hypothalamic PVN and increased ACTH and corticosterone responses.32, 33 Similarly, nonhuman primates reared as neonates with their mothers in a variable foraging demand condition for 12 weeks demonstrate significantly elevated CSF CRF concentrations along with stable traits of anxiety as adults.34, 35 We hypothesize that stress early in life results in a persistent sensitization or hyperactivity of CNS CRF systems to even mild stress in adulthood, contributing to the development of mood and anxiety disorders. This study sought to test this hypothesis in human subjects.


METHODS

Subjects

A total of 49 subjects, ages 18 to 45 years, distributed into 4 groups participated in the study. Presuming a moderate effect size (10%) according to Cohen,36 the power to detect a significant interaction effect among 4 groups and a time series of 8 repeated measurements at the .05 level of significance is 0.98.37

We recruited women without a history of significant early-life stress and no psychiatric disorder (controls: n = 12; mean age, 29 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24-34 years), women with a history of childhood sexual and/or physical abuse (repeated abuse, once a month or more for at least 1 year; sexual abuse, having been forced to touch another person's intimate parts, having been touched in intimate parts, attempted or completed vaginal, oral, or anal intercourse; physical abuse, having been spanked, kicked, or choked in a way that left bruises or injuries, having been attacked with a weapon or tied up or locked in a room or a closet; or both sexual and physical abuse, before the first menstrual period) without a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV)38 diagnosis of current major depression (n = 14; mean age, 30 years; 95% CI, 27-33 years), women with a history of childhood sexual and/or physical abuse and a DSM-IV diagnosis of current major depression (n = 13; mean age, 32 years; 95% CI, 27-36 years), and women with a DSM-IV diagnosis of current major depression but without a history of significant early-life stress (n = 10; mean age, 34.6 years; 95% CI, 28.59-40.60 years).

All participants were recruited via newspaper advertising from the general population and were remunerated for the time required for participation. Exclusion criteria for the study were irregular menses, significant medical illness, past or current presence of psychotic symptoms or bipolar disorder, and current presence of substance abuse or dependency or eating disorders. All subjects were free of hormonal (except for oral contraceptives) or psychotropic medication and were admitted as inpatients to the General Clinical Research Center of Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga, after providing written informed consent. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (Human Investigation Committee) of Emory University School of Medicine and was conducted from May 1997 to July 1999.

Early Trauma Inventory

The presence or absence of childhood trauma was assessed using the Early Trauma Inventory (ETI).39 The ETI is a structured interview that assesses the number, frequency, duration, and subjective impact of different types of traumatic experiences (physical, sexual, emotional abuse and general traumas). The ETI scale ranges from 0 to 524 for physical abuse and from 0 to 1017 for sexual abuse. High test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and external validity have been reported for the ETI.39 We additionally made an effort to obtain independent validation of the abuse from court, social service, or medical records and from family or friends, although not all subjects included in the study were able to provide such validation. For the diagnosis of depression and other psychiatric disorders, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV40 was used.

Cohort Characteristics

There were no significant differences in age, educational status, or ethnicity among the 4 comparison groups; however, there was a trend for fewer African Americans in the group of abused women with current major depression compared with the group of abused women without major depression (Fisher exact test P = .08). The 4 comparison groups did not differ with respect to the distribution of women using oral contraceptives (4 of 49) or women withdrawn from therapy with psychotropic medication (11 of 49). The magnitude of the abuse did not differ between abused women without major depression (mean ETI sexual abuse score, 131.71; 95% CI, 20.97 to 284.39; mean ETI physical abuse score, 199.36; 95% CI, 37.07-361.64) and abused women with major depression (mean ETI sexual abuse score, 70.84; 95% CI, 7.53-140.94; mean ETI physical abuse score, 173.84; 95% CI, 88.86-258.83).

The mean severity of the depression was in the moderate range for abused women with major depression (mean Hamilton Depression Rating Scale41 [range, 0-38] score, 19.0; 95% CI, 15.56-22.44) and nonabused women with major depression (mean Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score, 21.1; 95% CI, 19.30-22.89). There were no significant differences with respect to the prevalence of past major depression among women with a history of childhood abuse without current major depression (8 of 14), women with a history of childhood abuse with current major depression (9 of 13), and nonabused women with current major depression (8 of 10). Only 5 of 14 abused women without current depression met DSM-IV criteria for PTSD, whereas 11 of 13 abused women with current depression fulfilled a DSM-IV diagnosis of PTSD (chi2 1 = 6.68, P = .01).

For the induction of stress, we used a standardized psychosocial stress protocol that has been shown to reliably induce activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the autonomic nervous system.42 The test mainly consists of a 10-minute anticipation and preparation phase and a subsequent 10-minute public speaking and mental arithmetic task in front of an audience. In 6 independent validation studies, this protocol was shown to induce endocrine and autonomic changes reminiscent of stress, which significantly differ from placebo conditions.42 The magnitude of endocrine and autonomic responses is generally interpreted as reflecting biological stress reactivity.42

The psychosocial stress test was performed between 1:30 and 4:00 PM as described elsewhere.42 Blood samples from indwelling catheters and heart rate measurements were obtained in 15-minute intervals before (15 and 0 minutes), during (15 minutes), and after (30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 minutes) the stress exposure. Blood was collected in EDTA tubes, placed immediately on ice, and centrifuged at 4°C for 10 minutes at 3000 rpm. Plasma was separated, coded, stored at -80°C, and assayed for ACTH and cortisol concentrations by members of the research team blinded to group assignment and sample sequence using commercial radioimmunoassays (ACTH: Nichols, San Juan Capistrano, Calif; cortisol: DiaSorin, Stillwater, Minn).

Data Analysis

Hormone and heart rate data were analyzed using 2-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with repeated measurement (first factor was group, second repeated factor was time, and covariate was ethnicity). In the case of significant effects, between-subjects comparisons were performed for single time points followed by a priori defined contrasts to compare individual group means. In addition, maximum levels of hormone concentrations and heart rates were computed and compared among groups using ANCOVA (factor was group and covariate was ethnicity) followed by a priori defined contrasts. Homogeneity of variance was tested using the Levene test.43 In the case of unequal variance, raw data were logarithm transformed, and all analyses were repeated. All analyses were 2-tailed, with the level of significance set at P<.05.


RESULTS

Results obtained by 2-way ANCOVA with repeated measures indicated that the stress test induced significant increases in mean ACTH (main effect for the time factor [T]: F7 = 26.56, P<.001), cortisol (T: F7 = 54.92, P<.001), and heart rate levels (T: F7 = 26.62, P<.001) across all groups. With respect to ACTH concentrations, there was a significant main effect for the group factor (G) (F3 = 3.81, P = .02) and a significant group by time interaction effect (G T) (F21 = 3.81, P<.001). Ethnicity (categories: African American, white; determined by self-report) had a significant effect on plasma ACTH concentrations (F1 = 6.68, P = .01). Between-subjects comparisons showed that mean ACTH levels of the 4 groups significantly differed at 15 minutes (G: F3 = 3.40, P = .03; regression [ethnicity]: F1 = 5.88, P = .02) and 30 minutes (G: F3 = 5.85, P = .002) after the start of stress induction. Abused women with and without current major depression exhibited increased ACTH concentrations compared with controls and nonabused depressed women (Figure 1, A). Comparison groups also differed with respect to maximum ACTH concentrations (Table 1). Maximum ACTH responses minus baseline were more than 6-fold higher in abused women with depression (net peak, 9.0 pmol/L [41.0 pg/mL]; 95% CI, 4.7-13.3 pmol/L [21.6-60.4 pg/mL]) than in controls (net peak, 1.4 pmol/L [6.19 pg/mL]; 95% CI, 0.2-2.5 pmol/L [1.0-11.4 pg/mL]; difference, 8.6 pmol/L [38.9 pg/mL]; 95% CI, 4.6-12.6 pmol/L [20.8-57.1 pg/mL]; P<.001). Because of heterogeneity of variance of mean ACTH concentrations (Levene test41 P<.01), logarithm-transformed ACTH values were additionally computed, and all statistical effects for ACTH were confirmed (data not shown).

Comparison groups also differed with respect to profiles of cortisol responses (G T: F21 = 5.64, P<.001; regression (ethnicity): F1 = 1.01, P = .32). Between-subjects comparisons revealed that the comparison groups differed at 30 (G: F3 = 7.06, P = .001), 45 (G: F3 = 5.24, P = .004), and 60 (G: F3 = 3.47, P = .02) minutes after the start of stress induction, with abused women with current depression exhibiting higher cortisol responses than all other groups (Figure 1, B). The 4 comparison groups also differed with regard to maximum cortisol concentrations. Abused women with current depression demonstrated increased maximum levels vs all other groups (Table 1).

There was a trend of a group effect with respect to the mean heart rates (F3 = 2.24, P = .09; regression (ethnicity): F1 = .00, P = .95) across all time points. Significant differences between subjects were found at 15 minutes (G: F3 = 2.94, P = .04) after the start of stress induction. Abused women with current major depression exhibited significantly higher heart rate responses at this time compared with controls (Figure 1, C). Comparison groups also differed with respect to maximum heart rate levels. Abused women with depression demonstrated higher mean maximum heart rates than did controls (Table 1).


COMMENT

Severe stress early in life is associated with persistent sensitization of the pituitary-adrenal and autonomic stress response, which, in turn, is likely related to an increased risk for adulthood psychopathological conditions. This is the first human study to report persistent changes in stress reactivity in adult survivors of early trauma. The findings are remarkably consistent with findings from laboratory animal studies.32, 33

Increased pituitary reactivity to stress in some women with a history of early-life stress without psychiatric disorder may reflect a biological vulnerability for the development of stress-related psychiatric disorders. In these women, there appears to exist a counterregulatory adaptation of the adrenal cortex as reflected by increased ACTH concentrations but normal cortisol responses, which also has been observed in some animal models of severe early stress.34, 44 The manifestation of affective or anxiety disorders in adulthood may depend on additive factors, including genetic vulnerability and recent life stress. These factors, taken together, may result in relatively high CRF neuronal activity whenever these women are exposed to stress, ultimately resulting in symptoms of depression and anxiety.

Depressed subjects without early stress experiences showed normal stress reactivity, suggesting differential pathophysiology in subtypes of depression. Increased stress sensitivity may be related to a mixed state of depression and anxiety, including PTSD symptoms, which develops after early trauma. Recently, our group has shown that in rats many of the neurobiological consequences of maternal separation, including CRF hypersecretion, are reversed by treatment with antidepressants, including paroxetine and reboxetine (P.M. Plotsky, PhD; C.O. Ladd, BS; R.L. Huot, BS; et al, unpublished data, 2000).

Future studies in survivors of childhood abuse should separate the effects of different kinds of abuse at different developmental stages and should explore potential reversibility of this biological stress vulnerability after psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological intervention. Such findings may have important implications for the prevention and treatment of mood and anxiety disorders in survivors of early trauma. Much effort has recently been directed toward the development of CRF receptor antagonists for the treatment of depression and anxiety.45 The utility of CRF receptor antagonists in depression is currently being evaluated in an open-label clinical trial.46 Our findings suggest potential utility of such compounds for the prevention and treatment of psychopathological conditions related to early-life stress.



Author/Article Information


Author Affiliations: Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Trier, Germany (Dr Heim); and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (Drs Newport, Heit, Graham, Bonsall, Miller, and Nemeroff, and Ms Wilcox).

Corresponding Author and Reprints: Charles B. Nemeroff, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1639 Pierce Dr, WMRB, Suite 4000, Atlanta, GA 30322 (e-mail: cnemero@emory.edu).

Funding/Support: This work was supported in part by PHS grant M01-RR00039 from the General Clinical Research Centers Program, NIH, NCRR, and the Conte Center for the Neurobiology of Mental Disorders.

Acknowledgment: We thank M. J. Owens, PhD, B. Pearce, PhD, D. Knight, BS, A. Borthayre, BS, and S. Plott, BS, for comprising the stress test committee and S. Böhm, BS, and S. Welter, BS, for their contributions.



REFERENCES

1.
McCauley J, Kern D, Koloder K, et al.
Clinical characteristics of women with a history of childhood abuse.
JAMA.
1997;277:1362-1368.
MEDLINE

2.
Mullen PE, Martin J, Anderson J, et al.
The long-term impact of the physical, emotional, and sexual abuse of children: a community study.
Child Abuse Negl.
1996;20:7-21.
MEDLINE

3.
Roy A.
Early parental separation and adult depression.
Arch Gen Psychiatry.
1985;42:987-991.
MEDLINE

4.
Faravelli C, Sacchetti E, Ambonetti A, Conte G, Pallanti S, Vita A.
Early life event and affective disorder revisited.
Br J Psychiatry.
1986;148:288-295.
MEDLINE

5.
Hallstrom T.
The relationships of childhood socio-demographic factors and early parental loss to major depression in adult life.
Acta Psychiatr Scand.
1987;75:212-216.
MEDLINE

6.
Oakley-Browne MA, Joyce PR, Wells JE, Bushnell JA, Hormblow AR.
Disruptions in childhood parental care as risk factors for major depression in adult women.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry.
1995;29:437-448.
MEDLINE

7.
Agid O, Shapira B, Zislin J, et al.
Environment and vulnerability to major psychiatric illness: a case control study of early parental loss in major depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.
Mol Psychiatry.
1999;4:163-172.
MEDLINE

8.
Furukawa TA, Ogura A, Hirai T, Fujihara S, Kitamura T, Takahashi K.
Early parental separation experiences among patients with bipolar disorder and major depression: a case-control study.
J Affect Disord.
1999;52:85-91.
MEDLINE

9.
Kendler KS, Neale MC, Kessler RC, Heath AC, Eaves LJ.
Childhood parental loss and adult psychopathology in women: a twin perspective.
Arch Gen Psychiatry.
1992;49:109-116.
MEDLINE

10.
Kendler KS, Kessler RC, Neale MC, Heath AC, Eaves LJ.
The prediction of major depression in women: toward an integrated model.
Am J Psychiatry.
1993;150:1139-1148.
MEDLINE

11.
Portegijs PJM, Jeuken FMH, van der Horst FG, Kraan HF, Knottnerus JA.
A troubled youth: relations with somatization, depression and anxiety in adulthood.
Fam Pract.
1996;13:1-11.
MEDLINE

12.
Stein MB, Walker JR, Anderson G, et al.
Childhood physical and sexual abuse in patients with anxiety disorders in a community sample.
Am J Psychiatry.
1996;153:275-277.
MEDLINE

13.
Bremner JD, Southwick SM, Johnson DR, Yehuda R, Charney DS.
Childhood physical abuse and combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder in Vietnam veterans.
Am J Psychiatry.
1993;150:235-239.

14.
Saunders BE, Villoponteaux LA, Lipovsky JA, et al.
Child sexual assault as a risk factor for mental disorders among women: a community survey.
J Interpersonal Violence.
1992;7:189-204.

15.
Owens MJ, Nemeroff CB.
Physiology and pharmacology of corticotropin-releasing factor.
Pharmacol Rev.
1991;43:425-473.
MEDLINE

16.
Britton DR, Koob GF, Rivier J, Vale W.
Intraventricular corticotropin-releasing factor enhances behavioral effects of novelty.
Life Sci.
1982;31:363-367.
MEDLINE

17.
Sutton RE, Koob GF, Le Moal M, Rivier J, Vale W.
Corticotropin releasing factor produces behavioural activation in rats.
Nature.
1982;297:331-333.
MEDLINE

18.
Sirinathsinghji DJ, Rees LH, Rivier J, Vale W.
Corticotropin-releasing factor is a potent inhibitor of sexual receptivity in the female rat.
Nature.
1983;305:232-235.
MEDLINE

19.
Dunn AJ, Berridge CW.
Physiological and behavioral responses to corticotropin-releasing factor administration: is CRF a mediator of anxiety or stress responses?
Brain Res Rev.
1990;15:71-100.
MEDLINE

20.
Koob GF, Heinrichs SC, Menzaghi F, Pich EM, Britton KT.
Corticotropin-releasing factor, stress and behavior.
Semin Neurosci.
1994;6:221.

21.
Butler PD, Nemeroff CB.
Corticotropin-releasing factor as a possible cause of comorbidity in anxiety and depressive disorders.
In: Maser JD, Cloninger CR, eds. Comorbidity in Anxiety and Mood Disorder. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Press; 1990:413-435.

22.
Gulley LR, Nemeroff CB.
The neurobiological basis of mixed depression-anxiety states.
J Clin Psychiatry.
1993;54:16-19.
MEDLINE

23.
Nemeroff CB, Widerlov E, Bissette G, et al.
Elevated concentrations of CSF corticotropin releasing factor like immunoreactivity in depressed patients.
Science.
1984;226:1342-1344.
MEDLINE

24.
Banki CM, Bissette G, Arato M, O'Connor L, Nemeroff CB.
Cerebrospinal fluid corticotropin-releasing factor-like immunoreactivity in depression and schizophrenia.
Am J Psychiatry.
1987;144:873-877.
MEDLINE

25.
Widerlöv E, Bissette G, Nemeroff CB.
Monoamine metabolites, corticotropin-releasing factor and somatostatin as CSF markers in depressed patients.
J Affect Disord.
1988;14:99-107.
MEDLINE

26.
Hartline KM, Owens MJ, Nemeroff CB.
Postmortem and cerebrospinal fluid studies of corticotropin-releasing factor in humans.
Ann N Y Acad Sci.
1996;780:96-105.
MEDLINE

27.
Raadsheer FC, Hoogendijk WJ, Stam FC, Tilders FJ, Swaab DF.
Increased numbers of corticotropin-releasing hormone expressing neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus of depressed patients.
Neuroendocrinology.
1994;60:436-444.
MEDLINE

28.
Raadsheer FC, van Heerikhuize JJ, Lucassen PJ, Hoodendijk WJ, Tilders FJ, Swaab DF.
Corticotropin-releasing hormone mRNA levels in the paraventricular nucleus of patients with Alzheimer's disease and depression.
Am J Psychiatry.
1995;152:1372-1376.
MEDLINE

29.
Bremner JD, Licinio J, Darnell A, et al.
Elevated CSF corticotropin-releasing factor concentrations in PTSD.
Am J Psychiatry.
1997;154:624-629.
MEDLINE

30.
Baker DG, West SA, Nicholson WE, et al.
Serial CSF corticotropin-releasing hormone levels and adrenocortical activity in combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder.
Am J Psychiatry.
1999;156:585-588.
MEDLINE

31.
Altemus M, Pigott T, Kalogeras K, et al.
Abnormalities in the regulation of vasopressin and corticotropin-releasing factor secretion in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Arch Gen Psychiatry.
1992;49:9-20.
MEDLINE

32.
Plotsky PM, Meaney MJ.
Early, postnatal experience alters hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) mRNA, median eminence CRF content and stress-induced release in adult rats.
Mol Brain Res.
1993;18:195-200.
MEDLINE

33.
Nemeroff CB.
The preeminent role of early untoward experience on vulnerability to major psychiatric disorders: the nature-nurture controversy revisited and soon to be resolved.
Mol Psychiatry.
1999;4:106-108.
MEDLINE

34.
Coplan JD, Andrews MW, Rosenblum LA, et al.
Persistent elevations of cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of corticotropin-releasing factor in adult nonhuman primates exposed to early-life stressors: implications for the pathophysiology of mood and anxiety disorders.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1996;93:1619-1623.
MEDLINE

35.
Rosenblum LA, Paully GS.
The effects of varying environmental demands on maternal and infant behavior.
Child Dev.
1984;55:305-314.
MEDLINE

36.
Cohen J.
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
2nd ed. Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum; 1988.

37.
Erdfelder E, Faul S, Buchner A.
G-power: a general power analysis program.
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comp.
1996;28:1-11.

38.
American Psychiatric Association.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition.
Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.

39.
Bremner JD, Vermetten E, Mazure C.
The Early Trauma Inventory: development, reliability, validity.
J Trauma Stress.
In press.

40.
First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JB.
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV.
Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1997.

41.
Hamilton M.
A rating scale for depression.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.
1960;12:56-61.

42.
Kirschbaum C, Pirke KM, Hellhammer DH.
The Trier Social Stress Test: a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting.
Neuropsychobiology.
1993;28:76-81.

43.
Levene H.
Robust tests for equality of variance.
In: Olkin I, ed. Contributions to Probability and Statistics. Palo Alto, Calif: Stanford University Press; 1960.

44.
Ladd CO, Owens MJ, Nemeroff CB.
Persistent changes in corticotropin-releasing factor neuronal systems induced by maternal deprivation.
Endocrinology.
1996;137:1212-1218.
MEDLINE

45.
Holsboer F.
The rationale for corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor (CRH-R) antagonists to treat depression and anxiety.
J Psychiatr Res.
1999;33:181-214.
MEDLINE

46.
Zobel A, Nickel T, Künzel H, et al.
Effects of the high-affinity corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 antagonist R121919 in major depression: the first 20 patients treated.
J Psychiatr Res.
2000;34:171-181.
MEDLINE
http://www.lara.on.ca/~nmtruth/womenimpact.html

Pamela Pritchard wrote the following letter, introducing the letter of apology written by the PCUSA (Presbyterian Church) to the victims of Bill Pruitt and their families.



Dear friends,

This is the letter of apology (to us) adopted by the 216th General Assembly (in essence the "whole church"). I don't know how you feel about this, but I feel very honored, validated, joyful, and tearful. You are very, very courageous women and I was priviledged to have been your representative during this process.

Pamela Pritchard

1. We, the 216th General Assembly (2004) of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) acknowledge that our children, adolescents, and adults have suffered sexualabuse, molestation, and exploitation as committed by members and leaders of our congregations, governing bodies, and agencies, including those specific incidents that occurred in the Congo and continued in the U.S. church during the period of 1946- 1985, as identified in the Final Report of the Independent Committee of Inquiry, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) (September, 2002).

2. We apologize that we as a church did not take adequate steps to prevent the specific incidences as confirmed in the Final Report, that our church did not understand the significance of, or believe, the earliest reports of incidents of sexual abuse when survivors turned to people in positions of authority and responsibility, that our church did not do more at the time of their reporting to intervene and stop the perpetrators of sexual abuse, and that our church did not do more after discovering the truth of the victims’ allegations to reach out to others who might have been victimized.

3. We apologize that some of us in our church chose to doubt and discredit the survivors who came forward with the truth, that some dismissed the reports, and that some demonized them, all of which added a layer of pain and anguish to the original abuse.

4. We apologize that our church’s inactions over the years allowed hurt and harm to extend to the survivors’ families, children, friends, and faith. We recognize that we as a church have suffered losses in the nature and quality of our relationships as a community of faith.

5. We apologize that some of us in our church were complicit as our sisters and brothers in the body of Jesus Christ suffered the loss of their innocence, had childhoods stolen, lost opportunities to enjoy more of the fullness of life that God offers all in Jesus Christ (John 10:10b), and lost a child’s ability to trust the people of the church.

6. We acknowledge that survivors who have come forward have demonstrated a primary motivation to work through the church to improve our faith community, tell the truth, prevent further victimization, seek healing, and make our church safe for all.

7. We express our thankfulness to God for the courage of the survivors whose witness has held us accountable to be true to our calling as the followers of Jesus Christ. We express our gratitude to those among us who have listened to victims, supported their efforts, and worked for justice.

8. We welcome the many other women and men in our church who have been abused as they come forward, and we pledge to work with them so that they may be restored to God’s fullness of life.