Reader's comments on this article Add a new comment on this article

from wenowhotheliaris Friday, May 06, 2005 - 01:41 (Agree/Disagree?) Also just off the pedephile press joseph/jason told an australian court appointed social worker that none of the the accusations made by exmembers have been true, as no adults have ever been charged ,then another amazing event JASON produced a letter from the family/cog/fcf to state that his membership had lapsed !!what the???? (reply to this comment)

from rockyv Friday, May 06, 2005 - 00:58 (Agree/Disagree?) Hey settingthingstraight , i will set things straight for you ,you piece of horse shit were is your proof that the writer of the article is clinicaly insane.You are obviously as big a bullshit artist as the accused!Or are you the accused?I think you are ,and as your not liked by any ex members that i have had the privilege to meet in person or to talk to.I would not try this sort of approach you looser.Your feeble attemt at trying to label another of your victims with some type medical disability will not work with the informed people on this site.You are not talking to brainless twits like your current girlfriend. (reply to this comment)

from Fish Saturday, March 19, 2005 - 10:44 (Agree/Disagree?) What a gay article. (reply to this comment)

from Wolf Saturday, March 19, 2005 - 00:10 (Agree/Disagree?) Joseph is a male chauvinist pig who physically mistreated his wife and, as a young adult, had sexual relations with minors. His brother Peter is worse – he sexually abused a four year old boy, incidentally while the boy was in Joseph’s care. These facts have been established by the Australian police. No matter what their accusers may have done or how mentally unstable they may be, Joseph and Peter’s actions are inexcusable. (reply to this comment)

from Friday, March 18, 2005 - 06:43 (Agree/Disagree?) Clinically ill does not mean liar. A person who was abused may suffer post traumatic stress with varying symtoms, depression etc.. but that does not mean they are liars. You can't pull that trick anymore. Abusing someone so that they are damaged then using their damage as a reason that they would lie. Puleese. (reply to this comment)

from Shaka Friday, March 18, 2005 - 00:53 (Agree/Disagree?) It's almost 1 in the morning and I'm sans reading material. I did as I was bidden and you did not deliver! You're late! You are the liar! Sob! No seriously, I'm bored. Friggin' write something already. Where's the green beer.... (reply to this comment)

From Joe H Friday, March 18, 2005, 11:58 (Agree/Disagree?) Maybe it's fitting that this anonymous idiot titled his article "Liars"(plural). I don't know what annoys me more, the shameless self-promotion a la "Do you own a washcloth? It could be a deadly weapon! Watch FOX News tonight at 10!", or the attacking of a victim's credibility. Settingsthingsstraight, you're a loser. Keep that in mind. (reply to this comment)

From thepersoniamnow Sunday, March 20, 2005, 05:54 (Agree/Disagree?) Ur right Joe! Good for you for noticing the plurals and hyphens and whatnots...good for you man! Keep it up!(reply to this comment)

From Shaka Friday, March 18, 2005, 12:05 (Agree/Disagree?) We outta sue for false advertising and psycological damage since I can no longer trust news bulletins saying that something will be on at a certain time. (FOX says the Simpsons will be on at 6 but what if it's not?! What'll I do?) You hear that anonymous? You've scarred me for life! Goddamn you! Sniff, hold me...(reply to this comment)