Reader's comments on this article Add a new comment on this article

from jonbecker03 Sunday, June 20, 2004 - 03:15 (Agree/Disagree?) I enjoyed your poem. This whole world of email correspondence is kind of...weird emotionally. I guess these days you have your first cybercrush at the age of thirteen. And perhaps it is looked upon as a rite of passage. Weird... Jon (reply to this comment)

from =( Friday, February 28, 2003 - 01:45 (Agree/Disagree?) it feels good it feels true right when I know you till novelty wears off good bye my cybercrush (reply to this comment)

From To =( Saturday, March 01, 2003, 17:56 (Agree/Disagree?) are you bootylicious?(reply to this comment)

From Bootylicious Sunday, March 02, 2003, 03:58 (Agree/Disagree?) ...it wasn't me...!(reply to this comment)

from MGP Wednesday, January 01, 2003 - 14:35 (Agree/Disagree?) Remember there are also cyberstalkers! Cyber relationships are losing their innocense quicker than new wierdos can be generated. (reply to this comment)

From Bootylicious Wednesday, January 01, 2003, 15:41 (Agree/Disagree?) Of course there are weirdos, MGP, and the whole point of the phrase "it's bogus" in the rhyme, means just that!!! It is all just foolishness, nonsense, nothing serious can ever come of it. One can't actually have a cyber relationship, and you need to always remember that it is easy to only show your polite or funny side in a chatroom. In real life we all look different! (BTW, MGP, it is spelt "innocence"!)(reply to this comment)

From MGP Saturday, January 04, 2003, 14:06 (Agree/Disagree?) Good point, I always tend to show my aggressive side on the net. Its part of the net culture and people must learn to accept that net culture is different to "open" culture and people appear a lot wierdier cause they lose their inhibitions. This is very much the case with me if you've ever chatted with me you'll recognise that.(reply to this comment)

from Wiggles Tuesday, December 10, 2002 - 12:04 (Agree/Disagree?) :¬) (reply to this comment)

From estelle Wednesday, January 01, 2003, 01:20 (Agree/Disagree?) Bootylicious, this is so cute. I have someone to dedicate this to. Very clever. (reply to this comment)

From estelle Wednesday, January 01, 2003, 01:19 (Agree/Disagree?) (reply to this comment)

From estelle Sunday, January 12, 2003, 13:20 (Agree/Disagree?) hey booty, just wondering who you wrote this for?????(reply to this comment)

From tommyknocker Saturday, October 11, 2003, 12:32 (Agree/Disagree?) I know who...... :)(reply to this comment)

From Bootylicious Monday, October 13, 2003, 13:13 (Agree/Disagree?) Tommyknocker, usually, when writing poems, you take a slight feeling, even if imaginary, and exaggerate on it. It isn't REAL!!! Just an exaggeration of something that could or could not be a feeling. So save your smirk for yourself!(reply to this comment)

From sarafina Tuesday, October 14, 2003, 18:00 (Agree/Disagree?) umm I'm afriaid I'll have to smirk too..as I know who also.. so you may not so you might not want to go to far with the "imaginary,not real,and exaggerated" ;)(reply to this comment)

From morpheus Thursday, October 16, 2003, 17:19 (Agree/Disagree?) I know who too. So I'll smirk along with tommy and sara...smirk...smirk..smirk. God, my life is so interesting. (reply to this comment)

From Bootylicious Sunday, January 12, 2003, 15:47 (Agree/Disagree?) Fat chance that I will tell! hahaha!!! (reply to this comment)

From estelle Sunday, January 12, 2003, 16:01 (Agree/Disagree?) now now, dont sound too guilty. (reply to this comment)

From estelle Sunday, January 12, 2003, 16:01 (Agree/Disagree?) now now, theres nothing to be ashamed of, unless it was Andrew#7 of course. Open yourself up to the world. (reply to this comment)

From NR Wednesday, March 05, 2003, 22:01 (Agree/Disagree?) Uh, about Andrew7 aka A.F., a couple days ago on ExFam, some interesting info about this character came from someone who apparently knew him, Nick Proctor. Apparently '7*' was asked to leave TF for getting weird prophecies they didn't like and has been in and out of mental institutions pretty recently, seems to explain his obsession w/ that BS, yet being out of TF. IMO, it holds up, cuz 7*'had been ranting up a storm as of late on ExFam about his crap and how wonderful TF is, dumb theories, flaming, etc. well as of this last info, no more 7* comments on it at all. Not that anyone cares, but I think this solves the in-TF/not-in question -- he's just a crazy guy TF kicked out who thinks it's all a big test from the Lord. (reply to this comment)

from dan Monday, December 09, 2002 - 19:46 (Agree/Disagree?) I've been guilty of that (reply to this comment)

from reader Sunday, December 08, 2002 - 20:01 (Agree/Disagree?) not bad (reply to this comment)

From JoeH Sunday, December 08, 2002, 22:09 (Agree/Disagree?) it's exceedingly corny, but shows talent. Can we see some more of your stuff?(reply to this comment)

From EyesWideShut Sunday, December 08, 2002, 21:51 (Agree/Disagree?) I also thought it was quite inventive. Nice work;)(reply to this comment)

From xhrisl Saturday, January 04, 2003, 07:50 (Agree/Disagree?) I agree with Sunny, it's a wonderfully entertaining piece of work. Good job! (reply to this comment)