|
|
|
|
Reader's comments on this article Add a new comment on this article | from Suzuki9 Monday, June 28, 2004 - 04:29 (Agree/Disagree?) A full, point by point rebuttal has been written to The Skeptic's Annotated Bible. It's called The Skeptic's Annotated Bible: Corrected and Explained. Link: http://skepticsannotatedbible.org (reply to this comment)
| from Anthony Monday, July 01, 2002 - 19:17 (Agree/Disagree?) Cool someone else found this asa well.Was my June 13th link bad? http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/ (reply to this comment)
| From JohnnieWalker Tuesday, July 02, 2002, 10:59 (Agree/Disagree?) It's a prtty interesting site as it gets you thinking. But just reading the comments on the first chapter of Genesis made it clear to me that the person(s) behind this site hadn't done their research too well. They call the two accounts of Creation a contradiction as if there was only ONE creation. Even Jewish legend talks about 2 creations and Lilith being Adam's first wife. So I for one wouldn't rule out a second creation just because that's what I've always been taught. There are a lot more flaws on the site due to not taking the original languages into consideration, but I won't go into it under this section. (reply to this comment) |
| | | | from Craven Monday, July 01, 2002 - 17:13 (Agree/Disagree?) http://www.sanfords.net/Framed_pages/skeptics_annotated_bible.htm The link you gave was to your email. (reply to this comment)
| | | | | | |
|
|
|
|