Reader's comments on this article Add a new comment on this article

from Sonderval Tuesday, March 29, 2005 - 02:38 (Agree/Disagree?) As whether or not something goes to the trailer park is decided by your peers here it's not censorship, it's your audience telling you they're not interested in what you have to say. You have the freedom to speak, we have the freedom to decide we don't want what you say to remain in a thread, the freedom of speech should always be balanced by the freedom of the listener to decide what they want to be subjected to. Stop whining because people here didn't agree with your views, it seems the only freedom you're interested in is the freedom of everyone to tell you how smart and edgy you are, that isn't about to happen, oh and your manhattan skyline gag pic? Complete load of rubbish, it's not distasteful, funny or offensive, it's too puerile for that, it's just sad, go back to scribbling on toilet walls. (reply to this comment)

From Ian Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 18:28 (Agree/Disagree?) Who is whining? I asked why. That's all. I didn't ask you, specifically. However, you're opinion is here, I don't like it. I don't agree with it. But it's still here. I have no particular liking for the ridiculous picture you are referring to, in fact I didn't even upload it to this site, an x of mine did awhile ago, but I find it pisses people off and I care enough to give them something to do with their time besides correct my spelling. It's a curious thing watching a group of people who all experienced similar childhoods and who all (with some exceptions) had the same educational deficiencies, the way we paw and scrape for a little shine on our intellectual pride, rushing to point out a flaw in someones spelling or english. But, I don't have time for this crap, and I type 3 or 4 fingers poorly. I study business while working, I don't have the time to re learn what I know well enough to survive. I'm happy for those who have had it, but I don't actually think highly of you. I am fairly well trained in cryptography, morse code, electronics, RF theory, etc. I don't think it makes me any greater than most or overly sexy, it's just something I happen to know about, so fuck off and put my posts in the trailer park because Ricky was so sweet and I'm such a fucking jack ass. This is getting ridiculous, so..........later - dumbass. SIGNED BY IAN(reply to this comment)

From Haunted Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 18:55 (Agree/Disagree?) Dude, chill a minute - if you think about it, any violent/harsh/active threats stated in any post should be assigned somewhere else than the main site just because we can't afford to have Steve Kelly/aka Smith write things like "The editors of the site refuse to remove these violent comments". I don't think anyone's trying to censor any of us, but sometimes, when we get carried away, we tend to say things that ultimately would undermine the very position we purport to back. Not trying to be condescending, ot patronizing, I'm just saying, can we stand up and fight what's wrong without violence and threats - we all feel strongly about these wrongs, but I feel it does my cause no good to say things that would hurt that cause. love your friendly peacenick/liberal pansy, Joni(reply to this comment)

From Ian Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 19:34 (Agree/Disagree?) I don't recall threatening anyone?(reply to this comment)

From Haunted Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 19:45 (Agree/Disagree?) Sorry - I guess it was a blanket statement about the stuff I've read that people have written. Sorry. (reply to this comment)

from EyesWideShut Monday, March 28, 2005 - 18:39 (Agree/Disagree?) That's some crack-talk right there. (reply to this comment)

from roughneck Monday, March 28, 2005 - 18:00 (Agree/Disagree?) Sorry if I'm being clueless here, but what exactly are you referring to here? (reply to this comment)

From Ian Monday, March 28, 2005, 18:42 (Agree/Disagree?) Posts that are in the trailer park from one of the threads regarding Ricky's "suicide/perverts check out" that was apparently WAY to risque because I, um........well, I actually said that I thought of him as a hero of sorts and a few other things. I forgot the age bracket/political focus of my audience and unfortunately probably lost a few "good friends" who have by now, had just one to many episodes where all their good intentions of trying to change are proving to not pay off. Fuck me. I'll probably burn in masturbators hell, or pocket pool purgatory, with no friends, not even Fish (who appears to obsessed with his raging inferiority compex) who I dedicated my "Johnson in NY" masterpiece to at the first Gallery show. I'll learn to deal with it, hate me, I know....I suck ass. "Imperious, choleric, irascible, extreme in everything, with a dissolute imagination the like of which has never been seen, atheistic to the point of fanaticism, there you have me in a nutshell, and kill me again or take me as I am, for I shall not change" - Marquis de Sade(reply to this comment)

From lacy Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 07:23 (Agree/Disagree?) Umm, Ian, are you gay? I was just wondering, why would a GUY give another guy, sorry, I mean "dedicate", a blown-up picture or "masterpiece" of huge cocks sprouting up everywhere?(reply to this comment)

from Fish Monday, March 28, 2005 - 08:50 (Agree/Disagree?) Right… Keep taking whatever you’re on; you may just get lucky and o.d. You have an interpretation (note the spelling) of the Manhattan skyline?? WTF? Please go back to your internet/floppy gayness. And lastly, DON’T FUCKING SIGN YOUR NAME, that’s what the “from Ian” is for. Man, I hate it when people do that. Fish (reply to this comment)

From Ian Monday, March 28, 2005, 14:53 (Agree/Disagree?) I will, and I might. ".....fuck you're stupid label, and what it's for" From Ian(reply to this comment)

From Fish Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 02:06 (Agree/Disagree?) it's your, NOT you're, umkay?(reply to this comment)

From conan Monday, March 28, 2005, 11:01 (Agree/Disagree?) Dude, right on!! Conan(reply to this comment)