Reader's comments on this article Add a new comment on this article

from catuireal Saturday, February 23, 2008 - 16:08 (Agree/Disagree?) I think it´s easier if you make some millions of dollars and buy a media of your own or... climb the ladder of a big newspaper into the editorial council or sth. Or you could use Family tactics - print tracts and go "litnessing"... If you were requested some information than that´s one thing but it sounds like you want to use some journalist and a media vehicle with non-declared motives. Such a "cultic" way to do things. (reply to this comment)

from Jailbird Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - 14:08 (Agree/Disagree?) Hmm. ... If you've lived overseas and were in the group you have a network of people you grew up with etc., so verifying that you're not a cult mole, shouldn't be an issue. I doubt you'll have much success with the media while trying to remain anonymous. The media want blood, rape, gore., etc., that's what sells papers, tv ads etc., it's very rare to find journalists who are willing to peel the onion a few layers to get a substantive story out. But it does happen from time to time. Even if you can't give them all the gore they want, the general public does/will respond to personal stories, but you will have to "put yourself out there," as others have done. Doing it anonymously will not work, at least I've never seen an example where it has. You'll have to be prepared to be made a target by the group and your former peers, and pissy people on this site, and your story has to withstand fact checks etc. ... I'd be cautions of responding to anonymous email contacts from anywhere, especially people on this site. Get people on the phone, voice patterns give away a great deal about individuals that writing can't or won't. Don't give away information about yourself that will/can be used against you. In terms of your personal information and who you are, if you're going into it with a pre-set of expectations and understanding of how the media operates, what their objectives are the lifepsan of a story, what constitutes a story in their eyes etc. ... You're better off dealing with the media directly with documentation support from a few people, than by trusting anyone on this site. (reply to this comment)

from sar Monday, January 28, 2008 - 04:29 (Agree/Disagree?) I don't understand why people think that people on this site would trust someone or offer to help them without knowing what it is that they are helping them to do. Why the secrecy? Why the need for surprise? Why would you assume that people would give you information without you giving basic information on what the information given would be used for? (reply to this comment)

from shikaka Friday, January 25, 2008 - 12:45 (Agree/Disagree?) What an astonishingly dimwitted thing to do, posting such a thing on this website. I'm sure it'll now come as a massive shock to TF when you whip up your little media storm. They wont have gotten any warning! Cmon people! Lets at least pretend that we aren't "our own worst enemies". Sun Tzu is turning in his grave. (reply to this comment)

From Inspector Jacques Clouseau Sunday, January 27, 2008, 05:16 (Agree/Disagree?) Kato, this is so obvious that only an intellecual dufusite, of extreme dufusness, would believe that an anouncement outwardly seeming of such "extreme bogus-ness" , could actually be true. Therefore, Kato, it is obvious that this is a trap. No doubt, cultist reading this very same article are cunning enough to divine that agent code-named "muchmoney", is in fact attempting to mis-lead then into the bogus assumption that he actually is in the country or area where his profile originally said he was. Either that, Kato, or the shrewd, "Muchmoney" is attempting to mislead the cultist into thinking "This is so obvious, it couldn't possibly be a trap." Thus successfully luring the unsuspecting criminal cultist into an irrational state, in which said cultists percieves his situation to be one where he experiences a "level of relaxation" which is excessive and in no way commensurate with the relaxationary stimuli available to him or her and that ordinarily required to produce said "level of relaxation". Thus false sense of fantasticness or and spiritual gooviness falls over said cultist making them that much more unprepared-for, and vulerable to, MuchMoney's cunning media offensive. Incredible, Kato. ..(reply to this comment)

from Tester Friday, January 25, 2008 - 07:30 (Agree/Disagree?) This all sounds very shady.... (reply to this comment)

From my 2 cents Sunday, January 27, 2008, 12:13 (Agree/Disagree?) Speaking of shady, does anyone remember what Christmas (year) it was when cult managed to sneak their way in to the White House and sing for the President? Talk about embarrassing!(reply to this comment)

From Ne Oublie Sunday, January 27, 2008, 14:30 (Agree/Disagree?) I think it was somewhere around 95(reply to this comment)

From Samuel Sunday, January 27, 2008, 16:56 (Agree/Disagree?) They sang for the Bush (41) family at the White House for Christmas a few times. I remember CNN adding a little blip about that to their coverage of the raids in Argentina, which would have made it 1992 at the latest. They might have sung for the Clintons too.(reply to this comment)

From vix Sunday, January 27, 2008, 13:05 (Agree/Disagree?) I don't remember the exact dates but I think it was twice for the Bushes and once for the Clintons. Could be wrong, though. (reply to this comment)

From slim shady Sunday, January 27, 2008, 07:03 (Agree/Disagree?) Very shady, and not that slim either. ... :-0 (reply to this comment)

from figaro Friday, January 25, 2008 - 06:34 (Agree/Disagree?) I would be very cautious of who I spoke to about this via email. There are current members who get on this site and could easily send you an email saying they are one of the main members here like V, or Madly, or Johnny Walker for instance, and could just say they didn't want to say anything about helping you here on the board. Then you would have no way of knowing for sure if thats the person you're actually talking to and could give away important information to a currentmember and completely ruin your whole plan. Just a thought. Since I am assuming this is not in the US I don't think I could be of any help to you, just let us know whats going on when its safe to talk about it on a public board. Best of luck to you, bring those bastards some justice!! Just, if you can, try to only hurt the guilty, if you make the innocent suffer then how are we any better then them? (reply to this comment)

From madly Friday, January 25, 2008, 20:58 (Agree/Disagree?) Figs... you are cute. ;)(reply to this comment)

From ummmm Friday, January 25, 2008, 18:02 (Agree/Disagree?) why would you put Madly and Johnny walker in the same category? Unless your speaking in metaphor I don’t see the connection. (reply to this comment)

From figaro Saturday, January 26, 2008, 16:16 (Agree/Disagree?) Actually, other then them both being members of this community I said nothing about, nor put anyone in, a category. (reply to this comment)

From madly Friday, January 25, 2008, 20:56 (Agree/Disagree?) Ummm... what are you talking about?(reply to this comment)

From my 2 cents Friday, January 25, 2008, 21:12 (Agree/Disagree?) figure it out.(reply to this comment)

From madly Saturday, January 26, 2008, 14:18 (Agree/Disagree?) Ummm... I can't; that is why I asked. I guess I may be an idiot but I have no idea how it could be used as a metaphor? Why can't JW and I be in the same category (assuming there was one)? Anyone...?(reply to this comment)

From rainy Saturday, January 26, 2008, 15:28 (Agree/Disagree?) Just ignore it, Madness. I don't think they have any idea what they're talking about either. Just like to hear themselves talk.(reply to this comment)

From sar Monday, January 28, 2008, 04:18 (Agree/Disagree?) Are you suggesting that they can hear what they type? Awesome!(reply to this comment)

From BogusOmeter Measurement Sunday, January 27, 2008, 04:54 (Agree/Disagree?) I agree, the bogus-o-meter readings, on "2 cents' " comment is nearly off the scale, and indidcating a level of bogusness not previously imagined in existence.(reply to this comment)

From my 2 cents Monday, January 28, 2008, 10:07 (Agree/Disagree?) lol! Show me the money!(reply to this comment)

From rainy Friday, January 25, 2008, 16:18 (Agree/Disagree?) Hmm...you'd have to be pretty brainless to fall for that. At least you'd ask the other members, because most of us know each other's legal names and email addresses. I don't think anyone could get away with impersonating one of those (main?!) three, unless the person were a complete and utter idiot, or so new to the site that there would be no point in using the name of a frequent member anyway.(reply to this comment)

From sar Monday, January 28, 2008, 04:24 (Agree/Disagree?) Truly and Deeply impersonate Madly from time to time, or they say they are one and the same, which I'm not sure really is impersonating, but one could be fooled... I think.(reply to this comment)

From madly Monday, January 28, 2008, 05:24 (Agree/Disagree?) Poor "savage"... why did you go and have to leave her out? She is angry now. :P(reply to this comment)

From speaking of leaving someone out Monday, January 28, 2008, 12:20 (Agree/Disagree?) she must be having dinner with the other one. (reply to this comment)

From sar Monday, January 28, 2008, 05:54 (Agree/Disagree?) I do hope I didn't offend her too deeply. I couldn't remember whether Savage was one of claimants of your physical form. She seemed to have a character of her own, quite distinct from the rest. She can take it as a compliment, if that would make her less angry at me. :)(reply to this comment)

From mugthebug Monday, January 28, 2008, 10:23 (Agree/Disagree?) h ah amy poor blond brain just got it truely madly deeply by savage garden duhh on of my favorite songs btw(reply to this comment)

From neez Monday, January 28, 2008, 21:57 (Agree/Disagree?) Savage Garden!? *shudders*(reply to this comment)

From mugthebug Monday, January 28, 2008, 10:25 (Agree/Disagree?) and as you can see I can't spell either(reply to this comment)

From Lance Saturday, January 26, 2008, 22:54 (Agree/Disagree?) Actually, you never know. The cult could soon be sharpening their spiritual battle axes to combat the evil: "Barry_mon@yahoo.com" . . . I can see it now: The Evil internet has given a name to an anonymous IP address. (simulation) We pray to you, dear multiply endowed with many breast and penises savior. We ask that you endow us with a greater intelligent then the FBI and homeland security. . . who couldn't give a shit about us anyway; but with the awesome power of Jesus we will not cease in our commitment to countless hours of hissing at this demonic presence in cyberspace. (reply to this comment)

From figaro Sunday, January 27, 2008, 01:47 (Agree/Disagree?) That was the dumbest thing I have ever read. What besotted state were you in to demonstrate this tier of trumpery?(reply to this comment)

From ???? Sunday, January 27, 2008, 01:04 (Agree/Disagree?) ???(reply to this comment)

From figaro Saturday, January 26, 2008, 15:43 (Agree/Disagree?) For my rebuttal I have but three names. Prince, Sammy and Scorpion! haha(reply to this comment)

From conan Friday, January 25, 2008, 15:50 (Agree/Disagree?) HUH?? WHAT????? Seriously? This site has three main members? And they are 'V', 'Madly', and JohnnieWalker'???? Really? I had no idea. Did I miss the memo? I'm sure they're all very flattered and all, but were they elected? Are they appointed by admin? I want to know how I can make sure to never get on that short list, ever...so if you could let me know how they got there, I'll begin campaigning to avoid the same fate!(reply to this comment)

From madly Friday, January 25, 2008, 21:05 (Agree/Disagree?) When you find out how to avoid said fate, can you rescue me and take me with you, please?(reply to this comment)

From placebo Friday, January 25, 2008, 16:47 (Agree/Disagree?) don't be ridiculous, this site has about 20 members, all of which are monikers of vix...(reply to this comment)

From rainy Friday, January 25, 2008, 16:19 (Agree/Disagree?) Don't worry, we'll just form our own little society for all us Non-Mainers. :P PS How in the world did "V" become main? Has she published any articles under that one?(reply to this comment)

From figaro Saturday, January 26, 2008, 00:45 (Agree/Disagree?) damn guys, I only meant to use a few names as a "for instance" to show a point, they just happened to be the first three members that popped into my head, damn. lol(reply to this comment)

From rainy Saturday, January 26, 2008, 15:29 (Agree/Disagree?) I know; we were just having a little fun with you.(reply to this comment)

from Um Friday, January 25, 2008 - 06:01 (Agree/Disagree?) I hope Taiwan is not the country you are referring to as it states this is where you are in your profile! (reply to this comment)

From double uhm Friday, January 25, 2008, 10:09 (Agree/Disagree?) And it might have been better had you not gone and mentioned the copuntry in question, since now it doesn't matter that it's been removed from the profile. (reply to this comment)

From The original UM Tuesday, January 29, 2008, 08:39 (Agree/Disagree?) As the person posting this was stupid enough to put where they were in their profile and thereafter state "I will not be disclosing my location because of all the monitoring on this site. For this to be successful it needs to be a complete surprise." I for one would not contribute to anything they were doing!(reply to this comment)

From Inspector Jacques Clouseau Wednesday, January 30, 2008, 06:29 (Agree/Disagree?) Kato, this is so obvious, it could not possibly be a trap. On the serious side, if muchmoney is in fact trying to help expose the cult's activities in a certain country I don't think that sharing tips on how things can be done could hurt. I'd just be leary of giving away personal information.(reply to this comment)

From My little yellow friend Wednesday, January 30, 2008, 07:22 (Agree/Disagree?) KAAATO!(reply to this comment)

From KAAATOOOOO!!!!! Wednesday, January 30, 2008, 08:15 (Agree/Disagree?) KAAAAATTTOOOO!!!! heh hehhhh heh heh hehhh(reply to this comment)

From munchmoney Friday, January 25, 2008, 06:03 (Agree/Disagree?) Nope dont worry its all taken care of...(reply to this comment)