Reader's comments on this article Add a new comment on this article

from the latest Friday, October 06, 2006 - 08:34 (Agree/Disagree?) Someone sent me the following notice which from what I understand has now went out to TF about Abi Freeman's arrest and case. Sounds like case closed. From Abi (England)-- Answer to Prayer! Dear Family, Thank you so much for your prayers for me during my recent ordeal. I'm happy to let you know that the Lord has answered! The accusations were false in the first place, and after a time of investigation, the police have concluded that there is no grounds for them to pursue this further and the matter is closed. As you read in the prayer request, I was arrested. This is part of a procedure that the police in England use as part of their investigations. I was released on bail immediately after my interview, but I have now been released from the bail. I was never charged with a crime. There was never any factual basis for the accusations against me. I would like to say for your encouragement, in case you fear persecution, that our Husband is truly a very present help in trouble when we call on Him. The personal words He gave, the wonderful oldie-goldie tape of "Power in Persecution" scriptures, and the "Key Power in Persecution" Letter have been my ballast during this difficult time. Thank you again for fighting in prayer for the victory. Our wonderful Jesus, through the power of the keys, has once more protected us and "made the storm a calm" (Psa 107:29). I am thankful to now be able to concentrate once again on our Great Commission to win the world for Jesus! With love and thanks, Abi (reply to this comment)

From Big Sister Friday, October 06, 2006, 23:00 (Agree/Disagree?) She says she was never charged with a crime? I thought that when you are arrested you are charged with a crime; and you can't be held (even with bail) without being charged. (reply to this comment)

From Saturday, October 07, 2006, 02:14 (Agree/Disagree?) No, in the UK someone can be arrested, not charged and put on bail. If they subsequently find evidence against the person then they charge them, if they don't find evidence then they either release the person on bail or keep hunting for evidence and leave them on bail. (reply to this comment)

From PTL! Friday, October 06, 2006, 12:49 (Agree/Disagree?) Now she can hook up with John Mark Karr, also a free man, for similarly solid reasons! I guess Karr has the same wonderful key-wielding Husband.(reply to this comment)

From Big Sister Saturday, October 07, 2006, 20:55 (Agree/Disagree?) Or she could run for US Congress from the state of Florida. I believe there is a seat open!!(reply to this comment)

From Samuel Saturday, October 07, 2006, 21:10 (Agree/Disagree?) She better NOT be coming around here! Florida's actually getting tougher on child predators over the past year or so. Maybe Floridians are finally started to wake up to what's going on. What happened with Jessica Lunsford probably had something to do with it. What makes me mad is that the Democrats also knew about what Foley was up to. If the Republican leadership didn't want to deal with Foley (horrible call on their part), then the Democrats should have said something when they found out. Instead the Democrats let it keep going on until just before the election for maximum political gain. God only knows what Foley did during that period of time. Neither side had the best interests of the page at heart in my opinion, and that's just downright sick. And for those who might question my source, I found this out from the paper this morning, NOT Fox News! Good night, Samuel Mercuri (reply to this comment)

from chokehold Thursday, October 05, 2006 - 03:30 (Agree/Disagree?) No information will go to me whatsoever. On receipt of the email asking for details I will provide fax number for police. You can email under a "false name" and ask for the contact details that way. I DO NOT work with the police, represent them nor can i act on their behalf. I am not in a position to post the officers name and contact details on the internet. (reply to this comment)

from Wolf Wednesday, October 04, 2006 - 07:20 (Agree/Disagree?) May I recommend that you post contact information for the British police department that is handling this, in case anyone wants to contact them directly? (reply to this comment)

From sarafina Wednesday, October 04, 2006, 13:18 (Agree/Disagree?) At this point no addtional information will be posted at this time, If you want to help do so If not then don't, the information is needed today. The person you need to contact is the one who posted this article. If you don't trust the person then don't. I will certainly vouch for this person though and if you wish to write a personal affidavite please do then email chokehold and he will povide you with the fax nember for them.(reply to this comment)

From Wolf Thursday, October 05, 2006, 02:32 (Agree/Disagree?) Sarafina, I actually know Chokehold personally and that was not the point. The point is that others may not want to share their information with an individual they don't know. I guess posting contact information here is not a good idea since TF will likely harass the contact, but it is good to know that Chokehold will provide contact information to anyone who requests it by e-mail.(reply to this comment)

From Albatross Wednesday, October 04, 2006, 07:43 (Agree/Disagree?) Oh please...here we go again(reply to this comment)