Moving On | Choose your lifeMoving On | Choose your life
Safe Passage Foundation - Support to youth raised in high demand organizations


Saturday, January 31, 2009    

Home | New Content | Statistics | Games | FAQs

Getting Out : Creeps

Sounds like a victor program to me...

from Nick - Tuesday, December 07, 2004
accessed 2287 times

I found this article on the BBC web site. I can not believe that this is something that is allowed to go on. If you read the article you can see that most of the "teachers" are simply uneducated locals.

This article can be found at

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/this_world/4058833.stm

Tranquility Bay: The last resort By Raphael Rowe Reporter, Locked in Paradise

Some parents of rebellious teenagers in the US are turning to privately-owned correctional institutions to steer their wayward children back on the right path. But is this tough love tactic a step too far?

At Tranquility Bay, children have to earn the right to look at the ocean

Perched on the edge of a cliff in Treasure Beach - a remote fishing village in southern Jamaica - there is a hand-painted sign on the wall: "Welcome to Tranquility Bay."

This isolated boarding school is surrounded by security cameras, iron gates, barred windows and high concrete walls.

It looks like a top security prison; but it is neither a prison, nor a juvenile detention centre.

At a cost of between $25,000 (£13,000) and $40,000 (£20,800) a year, parents of unruly teenagers send their children here to learn how to behave.

Hard line

Tranquility Bay is one of several facilities run by an American business organisation called WWASPS, the World Wide Association of Speciality Programs and Schools.

Desperate parents do desperate things Jayne Levy, mother

According to their website, Tranquility Bay exists "to challenge and motivate the student in a structured, individualised learning environment... so they become mature, responsible and contributing members of society."

The teenagers inside are typically enrolled on the programme for three years, but this varies and largely depends on when the institution, and their parents, think they are fit to graduate.

As I glanced around the institution, some pupils - mostly white Americans dressed in khaki shorts and shirts, and flip flops - walked past me in line, military-style, with vacant expressions.

Not one of them looked at me, not even a peep from the corner of an eye.

Rules of admission

Shannon Levy lived in Tranquility Bay from 2000 to 2002

Fifteen-year-old Shannon Levy's parents arranged for their daughter to be forcibly taken from their home and escorted to Tranquility Bay.

"Three strangers - a lady and two big men - came into my house and sat me down on the sofa," Shannon told me.

"They said I was going to Jamaica and they handcuffed me and said I could co-operate or they were going to throw me over their shoulder. I was screaming for my mom because I had no clue what was going on. I was very scared," she said.

When I asked Shannon's mother Jayne why she felt the need to send her daughter to a school reputed for its harsh treatment of pupils, she simply said: "Desperate parents do desperate things."

Shannon had disrespected her mother, was sleeping around, drinking alcohol, smoking pot and not doing well at school.

Arguably, most of the children sent to the school flaunt typical teenage behaviour.

Ultimate endurance

In order to recondition these children, once inside, they are completely cut off from their home life.

They are not permitted to talk to their families until they conform to the programme - which is a reward and punishment system.

If you do what you are told, when you are told to do it - and do it the way the programme says you should - you earn points.

Children must lie in silence in OP

These points move you up to the next level in a "six-point plan", a method of acquiring "privileges".

If you do not obey the rules, or as one former student told me, you cannot do what is required of you, you have to face the consequences.

One consequence is being sent to Observational Placement, or what is known to the kids as OP.

On my way to the OP room I caught a glimpse of the sleeping dorms.

They were furnished sparingly with thin, lumpy mattresses on wooden bed frames that fold up against the wall, and wooden shelves on which children have attempted to neatly fold the few items of clothing they are issued.

In OP the children are made to lie on thin plastic mats on the floor, all day, sometimes day after day. They eat, sleep and stay in the room until the staff members guarding them decide they can leave.

Shannon Levy told me she spent eight weeks in OP.

Parrot fashion

To continue their education, the children work from text books and are partly self-taught.

Kids are guarded during self-study

If they fail a test exam they do it again and again until they pass.

Staff members are not trained teachers in all the subjects they supervise and are often recruited from the local community.

During meals, students are bombarded with self-improvement messages over the tannoy. They are played over and over again.

The children must then write essays about what they have learnt straight afterwards.

Controversy

Despite its hard and strict methods, many parents like Megan Quinn - who placed her son in the school - are pleased with the results.

Megan told me: "If it wasn't for the God-sent gift of this programme you'd be going to the lakeshore of Chicago where my father's buried, where my sister's buried, and putting flowers on his grave. So yes it hurts right now not to see him for 12 months but it would hurt a heck of a lot more not to see him for the rest of his life."

Other parents are not so convinced and taking legal action against WWASPs. "It was an act of desperation... and we were conned," said Julie Wilkinson, mother of ex-student Winston.

Concerns about the school's methods have also been raised by Bertrand Bainvel, head of the United Nations Children's Fund (Unicef), based in Jamaica. He wants OP scrapped, because he says: "There is a high possibility it falls under the definition of child abuse."

In response to the criticism, WWASPs say: "The schools have a tremendous record of success and growth. They have helped thousands of teens and their families and have a 97% parent satisfaction rate."

I began to consider a conversation I had earlier with the uncle of one young female student, as he tried to make his way past security to visit her.

"They're criminalising adolescence," he said, and as I walked out of the gate beyond the high walls into the full tropical sunlight, I wondered if he was right.

Locked in Paradise will be broadcast on Tuesday, 7 December, 2004, at 1930 GMT on BBC Two.

Reader's comments on this article

Add a new comment on this article

from farmer
Friday, December 10, 2004 - 00:22

(Agree/Disagree?)
Sorry, for piping up here, but I was actually expecting this kind of article even earlier...it's about a year ago, that I saw some TV-report about a bootcamp in the US...emphasis America, not Jamaica, which gave the impression of very strange similarities to what has been described here about the Victor camps etc...so I thought, this surely would be addressed here.I just made a quick google-search & following are some useful links (entering: Teen help program Boot Camp)...

http://www.kci.org/publication/bootcamp/docs/nij/Correctional_Boot_Camps/table_context.html
(more about Teens in such camps due to minor criminal offenses...)

http://www.bootcampsforteens.com/

http://www.rickross.com/reference/teenboot/teenboot40.html

http://www.familyfirstaid.org/
(list of camps, also features "tranquility" bay)



I also read, that there's this very sad figure of an estimated over 30 cases of death in these various teencamps.Last, one 14 year old Anthony Haynes died 1.July 2001 in Arizona...stressing heat & being forced to eat sand?! is one of the cruelties (not) endured there!
(reply to this comment)
From Vicky
Friday, December 10, 2004, 01:32

(Agree/Disagree?)

I think Tim R posted an article on something similar a while back. It may even have been about the same 'corporation' (Wwasp), but I don't recall the details, and well, I can't be bothered to look it up.

Oh darn it, I guess I shouldn't be so lazy...

Here it is:

http://www.movingon.org/article.asp?sID=1&Cat=10&ID=1411(reply to this comment

from steam
Thursday, December 09, 2004 - 14:03

(Agree/Disagree?)
I have to say I have read a little more about this place and it is horrific. I believe that only in rare locations did the Family go quite as far as this place does. Although these kids probably suffer little sexual abuse, which can be absolutely devastating to many. However I do agree with the point made, that automaticaly stating "it's the parents fault" when a kid becomes a "problem case" is not always accurate. Even if it may often generally be true.
(reply to this comment)
From Nick
Thursday, December 09, 2004, 14:27

(Agree/Disagree?)
Yes, I do agree that in some cases you can have a problem child that comes from a good home. But in that case you send the kid to a qualified facility with teachers and councilors that are trained and fully educated in psychology and child development.
Not some local dude with about the same education as our victor "bellwethers" and "Shepherds" had.

I really can not believe that this camp has not been shut down by local CPS. Sounds like a torture camp to me.

I would like to hear XCHrists thoughts on this camp. He seems to have a pretty good grasp on this type of thing and works in a youth facility doesn't he?(reply to this comment
From sarafina
Thursday, December 09, 2004, 16:08

(Agree/Disagree?)
I know you meant Chris AKA "Xhrisl" but I do like Joe's thoughts on the whole "X-Christ" subject as well. I hate to be a copycat but I think that's an excellent way to phrase his name now. As that's exactly all he is to me now, an X.

As for Chris, I'd like to hear his opinion on this facility as well however the facility he works in is nothing like this. The boys there are not starved, tortured, brainwashed and not allowed to contact their family. They are simply kept on medication (if prescribed) and Kept till their sentence is up. Most of the boys there would be in Jail for criminal activities if not for this option. I think that is different from the way we were punished for simple things such as talking back,thinking differently,voicing opinions and wanting to watch movies, have sex or engage in other NORMAL activities for our age. Which we were not allowed to do. We were not BAD kids.(reply to this comment
From Nick
Friday, December 10, 2004, 09:17

(Agree/Disagree?)
Oh yeah. I knew his facility was not like that at all. I was just curious as I know he works in that field(reply to this comment
From Nick
Friday, December 10, 2004, 09:17

(Agree/Disagree?)
Oh yeah. I knew his facility was not like that at all. I was just curious as I know he works in that field(reply to this comment
From The Pedantic Prick
Thursday, December 09, 2004, 14:52

(Agree/Disagree?)

XChrist? Is this the former messiah? Or the guy who you thought was your saviour before you stopped believing in him? I like it. I think I might start using it to observe the fact that Jesus is, in modern society, an ex-Christ. If God is dead, his son should be too, right?

I'm not critiquing your (minor) misspelling so much as thinking out loud. Or should I say "online"? Is it wrong to say "out loud" since I'm sitting quietly in my office?(reply to this comment

from frmrjoyish
Thursday, December 09, 2004 - 05:01

Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5(Agree/Disagree?)
I think it's the parents who should be sent to some sort of parenting bootcamp. Children don't get this way overnight. It develops as a result of abuse, neglect, or poor parenting at the very least. It infuriates me the way some parents, including my own, show no responsibility for the way their children turn out. Personal responsibility is a factor but that goes double for those responsible for molding and shaping a child. Parents who resort to this cruelty are adding insult to injury upon a child who has probably gotten a raw deal to begin with. They should be ashamed!
(reply to this comment)
From lisa
Saturday, December 11, 2004, 13:44

Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5(Agree/Disagree?)


I compleatly agree parents should be made responsible. I also think there should be more saport and training for parents. There is no other job in the world where people are thrown in compleatly untrained and expected to know everything.(reply to this comment

From moon beam
Thursday, December 09, 2004, 08:24

Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5(Agree/Disagree?)
Right on!!
it takes time effort, sacfrifice and patience to hold boundaries for a young child. The other options are do nothing, "he can't sleep unless I go to bed with him,let him have that if it stops him crying" etc.. let your child run wild to give you more peace. (which is a sign that the child is looking for your attention.)
The other be too strict slap him into submission and fear, which youu'l reap as soon as he gets big enough plus he learns to use that reasoning throughout his life.
If the time isn't spent when they are young getting it right you lull yourself into a false impression and when the child starts going "off the rails" these places seem ideal when you feel like "washing your hands off them". And like Nick said they don't work for the bennefit of the child/teen.
(reply to this comment
From Nick
Thursday, December 09, 2004, 07:13

Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5(Agree/Disagree?)

I totally agree.

If there is one thing I learned from the victor program it is that you can not force or scare a person into changing. All that the victor programs did was scare us into PRETENDING to be good and change. We were still the same people inside. Still just as worldly and still just as "evil". The only difference is that we knew how to act around them so they would believe that we had changed. All while growing more bitter and resentful of them inside. (reply to this comment
From JohnnieWalker
Thursday, December 09, 2004, 11:16

Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5(Agree/Disagree?)

"you can not force or scare a person into changing"

I'm proof of that. I went through a Victor Camp because of my "problems with foolishness". Some good that did.(reply to this comment

From Good Fruits
Thursday, December 09, 2004, 15:19

(
Agree/Disagree?)

Well as a result we have the New Wine of the Hitler revelations -- the most entertaining Word Time ever! Why am I tempted to interject "PTL?" I must still have a "problem with letting go of the past," LOL.(reply to this comment

from Wolf
Thursday, December 09, 2004 - 03:48

Average visitor agreement is 4 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 4 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 4 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 4 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 4 out of 5(Agree/Disagree?)
Somebody should send this to Zerby. It’ll probably result in a new revelation that TF should start a commercial project similar to this -- after all, they have lots of experience suppressing and abusing young people. Then we’d have one more approach to starting legal action against them.

On second thought, I wouldn’t wish TF’s abuse on anybody, not even criminals and druggies.

As for the outfit described here, they sound cruel, but not any more so than the military. I guess the difference is that people sign up for the military of their own volition.
(reply to this comment)
from Vicky
Thursday, December 09, 2004 - 01:06

Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5(Agree/Disagree?)
I read up on this 'correctional program' quite extensively a little while ago, having come upon it by chance while researching for school. I was absolutely horrified and actually felt quite ill at the thought that this could happen in this day and age, and with parental consent! The worst thing about it, in my opinion, is that the program continues indefinitely, with NO WAY OUT unless there is a complete breakdown of personal will on the part of the 'inmates'. It is, quite frankly, frightening to contemplate the underlying psychological effects of this program on those who are forcibly incarcerated therein and systematically stripped of all pride, self-respect and individuality. Although the treatment may work in the short term I have grave misgivings regarding the long-term damage it could cause to the mental health of these vulnerable young people.
(reply to this comment)
From lisa
Thursday, December 09, 2004, 09:23

(Agree/Disagree?)
(reply to this comment
From lisa
Thursday, December 09, 2004, 09:42

Average visitor agreement is 1 out of 5(Agree/Disagree?)

I think that in some cases it is waranted. True it would be preferable if it wasen't needed and they had been trained right from the begining, obviously this is a last resort, but what else can you do? Its no good saying what should of been done, what do they do now? Its not always as simple as bad parenting,I've seen stories where the parents did everything right, loved their kids ,gave them a good home, The kids went to good schools ,ate right, etc and yet still turned out to be violent drugies in and out of juvie. Though I do think in these places prisons also more attention should be spent on the inmates reabilatation and training then on simplybreaking them down and serving their time.(reply to this comment

From JohnnieWalker
Thursday, December 09, 2004, 11:14

Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5(Agree/Disagree?)

Do you have children, Lisa? If so, could you imagine sending your children to a program like this?(reply to this comment

From Vicky
Thursday, December 09, 2004, 10:21

Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5(Agree/Disagree?)
Sorry, but it's obvious by your reasoning here that you left TF quite recently. It's a typical response of those who believe that the end justifies the means, which is a ridiculous opinion to hold when making judgements on ethical issues. I do agree with you on the need for a shift toward rehabilitative philosophy in prisons and juvenile institutions, though.(reply to this comment
From lisa
Saturday, December 11, 2004, 13:39

(Agree/Disagree?)
Actually I didn't, and no I don't think sex or smoking dope are crimes, nor do I think physical violence or anything that destroys basic human rights is right or should be used. I don't beleave those tactics would do anything other then teach thouse children how to survive and go deep inside themselves. However there are a few of these camps that utilize less drastic mesures, and I do think there is a place for them. Yes, I do have a child and as much as it would tear me up to have to send him to one of these places, if I compleatly failed as a parent and he was a serious threat to himself, or others, then yes I would consider sending him to such a place. It's better then prison or death.(reply to this comment
From night_raver
Thursday, December 09, 2004, 14:51

(Agree/Disagree?)

I agree, I've also read some other stuff about this particular place and it's quite chilling, the article here barely scratches the surface. I spent my share of time in Victors, isolation, and about every other flavor they cooked up, the stories I've read of here are way worse. Besides living in filthy conditions (though probably up to Jamaican standards), and the isolations, the method of punishment was to put the 10 or 12 yr old on the floor while one adult twists the kids' arms behind their backs as far as possible, and others then twist the knees and ankles backwards and they hold them like that up to 4 hours -- this can definitely cause physical damage to the joints and tendons & I'm guessing many of those kids will have physical problems later on in life because of that.

I understand Juvie hall, but this place is Guantanamo for kidz -- I'm sorry Lisa, do you seriously think that a teen having sex or smoking weed has committed such a bad crime that they are treated worse than criminals in US penal institutions? So if a minor disrespecting their parents and smoking weed gets that, do you think we should bring back torture to prisons for adults? (reply to this comment

From
Thursday, December 09, 2004, 15:26

(
Agree/Disagree?)

I ran away before being sent to a victor camp, but I unfortunately do "have physical problems later on in life" because of the abuse I was put through by my Shepherds in The Family. Not to mention the psychological suffering.

Did you know that one of Ashcroft's buddies makes money off WWASP-type camps (or WWASP itself, I'm not sure).(reply to this comment

From Vicky
Thursday, December 09, 2004, 01:40

Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5Average visitor agreement is 5 out of 5(Agree/Disagree?)

Further Information:

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/magazine/story/0,11913,987172,00.html

(reply to this comment

My Stuff


log in here
to post or update your articles

Community

84 user/s currently online

Web Site User Directory
5047 registered users

log out of chatroom

Happy Birthday to demerit   Benz   tammysoprano  

Weekly Poll

What should the weekly poll be changed to?

 The every so often poll.

 The semi-anual poll.

 Whenever the editor gets to it poll.

 The poll you never heard about because you have never looked at previous polls which really means the polls that never got posted.

 The out dated poll.

 The who really gives a crap poll.

View Poll Results

Poll Submitted by cheeks,
September 16, 2008

See Previous Polls

Online Stores


I think, therefore I left


Check out the Official
Moving On Merchandise
. Send in your product ideas


Free Poster: 100 Reasons Why It's Great to be a Systemite

copyright © 2001 - 2009 MovingOn.org

[terms of use] [privacy policy] [disclaimer] [The Family / Children of God] [contact: admin@movingon.org] [free speech on the Internet blue ribbon] [About the Trailer Park] [Who Links Here]